Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

655

(post is archived)

[–] • 8 pts

Yeah.. the biggest red pill for me on that topic was the fucking WTC 7 which wasn't even hit!

[–] • 6 pts

The biggest redpill is all the jews who knew about it before hand and didn't go to work that day kek.

[–] • 3 pts

Nah that sounds crazy to normies, but even they have some trouble brushing off a building just falling down on its own.

[–] • 5 pts

But muh office fires!

[–] • 1 pt

Imagine believing this. I never did but it always planted a seed of doubt.

It wasn't till the study confirming explosives in 2017 did I discover surety

[–] • 2 pts

It's crazy. I have a couple of relatives that get defensive about it when its brought up. I try to be understanding because that just obliterates their view of our government. It's a hard pill to swallow.

Regardless I still beg them to explain to me how the only 3 skyscrapers to ever come down due to impact/fires in history all came down in a way that would be a demolition engineer's wet dream and it all happened in one day. In a matter of hours even.

[–] • 1 pt

Yeah... look at the fucking video there is some smoke coming out of like ONE window and then the whole thing collapses.

[–] • 3 pts

Three steel structures collapsed due to fires one right after the other even though that has never happened in history or since.

[–] • 4 pts

Was there supposed to be sound?

[–] • 4 pts

If you turn it up to 60% or 70% you can kind of make out what he's saying.

[–] • 1 pt

It was only slightly quiet for me

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts (edited )

Lucky Larry Silverstein. Purchased 6 months before the attack, insured the buildings and made a fortune. Lucky he didn't go to work they day because his wife made him go to the dermatologist that morning. Larry's son Roger, and daughter Lisa, were not in their WTC offices that morning either. Silverstein is also a staunch Zionist with strong connections to three of Israel’s prime ministers including Benjamin Netanyahu, Ariel Sharon and Ehud Barak.

[–] • 2 pts

Rik Mayall is grandpa?

[–] • 2 pts

the crazy thing is the planes hit between the 80th and 100th floor on a 110 story building, meaning they were in the top 10-15% of the building and the higher a building goes the less weight there is per story (the highest floors weight significantly less than the lower stories). It would be the equivalent of a lumberjack cutting down the very top of a tree and rather than it fall off to the side it fall through the entirety of the trunk all the way down to the base then be nothing but splinters afterwords. It's such a ridiculously obvious demolition, the fact that there are still normies after this event shows how doomed civilization truly is.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

My typical family conversation on Thanksgiving just before whatever nigger ball game comes on.

[–] • 1 pt

Didn't even need the explicit reference to airplanes.

[–] • 1 pt

The World Trade Center was not made of building blocks.

[–] • 7 pts

It also did not spontaneously fall inwards

[–] • 1 pt

No, it was made of thick steel columns that would act as a heat sink.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Or when the building that wasn't hit fell as well.

[–] • 0 pt

Industrial Steel losses 50% of it's strength at 700 degrees. That was enough to them collapse.

This is pretty basic materials science (referred to has failure plastic deformation) and I never understand the "the planes didn't cause the WTCs to collapse." Yes they most certainly did and it's rather easy to do with just those planes and the subsequent fires.

The conspiracy is not that the planes caused the buildings to fall: that's very easily possible with no tinfoil hat theories necessary. It's all the other stuff surrounding the situation that is quite suspicious (one of you posted one of those about the insurance).

As for Tower 7, it was the fire from collateral fallout. It was also on fire but for a very long time. The fire only needs to be 600 degrees for a sustained period of time to weaken the industrial steel support, causing it to collapse at near free-fall.

The density of steel is 7800Kg/m3. The Yang’s modulus is 200GPa. The Poisson ratio is 0.27. The yield strength is set to be 310MPa, according to Steel A440 in U.S. The hardening modulus is set to be 2GPa, 1% of initial modulus.

This group shows that only 800F is required to cause significant structural integrity loss of the exact type of steel beam used in the WTCs:

https://youtu.be/4LFZA0Rx1gg?t=302

However, another group of engineers and scientists disagrees with the weakened steel theory for Tower 7 and this is a new thing. Here's what they have to say:

https://canada.constructconnect.com/dcn/news/others/2020/05/world-trade-center-7-building-did-not-collapse-due-to-fire-report

It's important that everyone be aware of "all sides" of credible arguments. Don't just stick with the naysayers or yeasayers. Look at all credible arguments. Read my comment and understand that there is a very large amount of data on all of this. While we definitely have solid science for almost all this, not all of the science is settled.

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

Found the due.

The steel in the support columns were wrapped in fire retardant which is why in the national engineering tests where they tried to weaken the beams they couldn't until they altered the test and removed the fire retardants.

Which they had zero evidence to justify such a condition.

The towers fell to explosives.

We know that for a fact tower 7 did so we can extropulate out that the other two did as well.

The planes were a distraction

[–] • -1 pt

Found the due.

Found the retard.

There's no way you had time to review the evidence and come up with a reply. Had you done that, you'd understand why not even the 9-11 conspiracy theorists use the very stupid and retarded talking point about "fire retardant."

Like you did, here:

The steel in the four support columns were wrapped in fire retardant

Go back, read, watch, come up with better arguments.

[–] • 2 pts

Hey cunt.

Those beams had fire retardant coatings. A fact found in the plans. A fact mentioned by the official nist report.

You can't dismiss a fact that destroys your bs rhetoric and not get called out for it.

Oh and cunt. I don't give a fuck how other ppl argue the truth.

Article describes the fireproofing used https://www.fireengineering.com/fire-prevention-protection/fireproofing-at-the-wtc-towers/

Official government commissioned report discussing the four tests which tried to replicate the collapse with jet fuel fire (wasn't even a jet fuel fire) but couldn't.

https://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf

And the wtc 7 study that found that the tower was demolished.

https://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7

[–] • 1 pt

Oh fuk just read your name.

You're a known glowie.

Fbi or Soros funded poal infiltrator.

I mistreated you.

You are paid to be here to hide truths and cause confusion.

I remember you cunt from when you pretended that mrna drugs are vaccines.

[–] • 0 pt

That looks like truth or dare Jenga as well. I thought it was going a different direction.