The work of one woman was, it turned out, the equivalent of the labours of three men.
Wrong, the lesson is that the work of three men was better than the labours of all women writers.
>The work of one woman was, it turned out, the equivalent of the labours of three men.
Wrong, the lesson is that the work of three men was better than the labours of all women writers.
Yeah what's that shit? They try to spin it? Not only did she not write anything but they're essentially saying 3 men had to write at her level. She didn't write shit in the first place and they are counter aguring it. Lol this day in age is fucking hilarious.
Yeah what's that shit? They try to spin it? Not only did she not write anything but they're essentially saying 3 men had to write at her level. She didn't write shit in the first place and they are counter aguring it. Lol this day in age is fucking hilarious.
Female authors create unreadable works.
As you might imagine worthy titles are rare now given how feminised male authors are.
Insipid female worshipping shit coupled with lots of feels and weak main protagonists and limp dick blooming romance lest a man get laid
Female authors create unreadable works.
As you might imagine worthy titles are rare now given how feminised male authors are.
Insipid female worshipping shit coupled with lots of feels and weak main protagonists and limp dick blooming romance lest a man get laid
(post is archived)