WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

I bet you think (((Lincoln))) wasn't a kike or philosemite too.

I stand by Every. Single. Time. When in doubt, it's the kikes. Especially when there is corroborating evidence/circumstances. There may be a few false positives, but it is statistically unlikely.

[–] 0 pt

All I’m saying is that by all accounts I’ve read by people who weren’t out for blood from him, he was a devout Christian, not a kike.

I couldn’t care less about Lincoln. He fought a war to oppress half a country while claiming it was to free slaves. That’s top kikery, blood or no.

[–] 0 pt

I think Columbus was just a useful kike who escaped the expulsion. He was a Zionist before the term was conceived. Lincoln too.

[–] 0 pt

A "devout Christian" during the Spanish Inquisition just might be putting on airs.