Your version of history is from a book that makes a lot of spurious claims, like Hinduism being the oldest religion, I am just describing what the linguistic, archaeological & anthropology evidence suggest. But Neo-Pagans gunna Neo-Pagan, enjoy the Kundalini or Tantric sex or whatever.
No, my version is from the DNA evidence matching the oral history of these regions exactly. Yours is based on you having a fantasy where you are the Special Boy.
No, the DNA suggests that the Aryans who conquered India branched off a shared ancestry. Many peoples keep an oral history, do you expect me to trust them all or are Indians special mongrels? Some Indians say we evolved from them, daft pajeets. There's a reason why writing is superior, because even if something changes, it's easier to objectively compare between re-writes to see when & if something was altered. Imagine not being the special boy, how do you even get up in the morning?
Indians aren't aryan. The aryans left to go west.
Do you even read what other people write or do you just rant?
(post is archived)