The issue is if we start banning something then anything could be banned by applying that label.
Are you retarded? Do you know what a baseless, fallacious argument is? Are you implying that by banning, say, gangster rap, we risk banning, say, Mozart? Because someone might call Mozart "degenerate"?
You're either retarded or you're Jewish, my man.
I'm saying that any ban of media risks entirely different things being caught up in it as the only one who would can view the content is the state. There's nothing stopping a news article contrary to the narrative being labelled as pornography, nobody would be able to say differently so the charges could be applied to anything.
That's the same logic people use when they say we should ban guns because of the one in a million school shooting.
Do not make policies based on the extrodinarily unlikely outlying possibility.
We have a corrupt government pushing degeneracy and you don't want to make laws to ban degeneracy because...you'd rather have interracial gangbangs and simulated incest porn than risk the government censoring something?
(post is archived)