>That's effectively impossible. Courts can not read minds to show how "willful" an action was. Not that it matters as they can't be sued in the first place. Then you clearly have no idea how tort law works in the US. Litigation can and has worked quite well, many times, when it come to willful negligence lawsuits. The four elements usually required for "gross negligence" or "willful negligence" are: 1. Duty of care 2. Breach of duty of care 3. Causation 4. Damages A litigious lawyer will assemble a very obvious case for all 4 bullet points. In the case of a vaccine manufacturer, this is nigh impossible unless they had people dying in their Phase II and III human trials and tried to hide it. >Lol sure. Which company? Every single one of them had to apply for immunity or they would not do business with those countries. Every. One. For example, here is why Pfizer is not giving their vaccine to India: https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-india-pfizer/pfizer-drops-india-vaccine-application-after-regulator-seeks-local-trial-idUSKBN2A50GE Hint: India wanted a local human trial study before they'd approve their immunity. >Yeah, those damn litigious Americans, suing over stupid stuff like their lives and ability to support themselves being ruined by something they were coerced into taking. Oh, you're definitely retarded. Grade A retarded. Only a retard resorts to a idiotic strawman like this. Get back to me when you're intelligent enough to actually address my point about capping liability in the US because of how sue-happy the US is. Yes, fuck the lawyers who sue for millions when some slipped and fell because they "couldn't see" a wet floor sign. >Oh God won't someone think of the corporations!? That's literally not how tort reform works at all. You're a reddit-leftist-retard, aren't you? The only people making arguments like yours against tort reform are Marxists who hate capitalism in any form.