![[StoneToss] The risk is negligible for who? [1000x500 - 41KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/0gIr5c.png){kind=link}
I legit lol'd at your summary quote.
I covered that angle, already: even without the protections, you likely wouldn't win a case anyway because the burden of proof is far too high for "willful misconduct."
I legit lol'd at your summary quote.
I covered that angle, already: even without the protections, you likely wouldn't win a case anyway because the burden of proof is far too high for "willful misconduct."
Don't try to argue with anticlit. He's a retard.
He thinks there were no WTC planes. But if you call him out he acts like a faggot, calls you a kike, and blocks you.
Proof below.
https://poal.co/s/Videos/434323
Good luck arguing with him. He's probably already blocked you.
Don't try to argue with anticlit. He's a retard.
He thinks there were no WTC planes. But if you call him out he acts like a faggot, calls you a kike, and blocks you.
Proof below.
https://poal.co/s/Videos/434323
Good luck arguing with him. He's probably already blocked you.
(post is archived)