What about a straight guy stuffing his ass with broccoli?
If an individual has never tried suicide and another has tried it once and both say "I do not want to die", who has the more valid claim?
If straight White men rise up and start throwing faggots off of rooftops, does that make them Muslim?
You'd probably be right about woman, either way.
Except to actually ram it in the shit means you have to be aroused despite the smell and sight. Therefore you would need homo tendencies to be able to do it at all. To be unable to get it up before the act occured means you are disgusted by homo shit. It would be like if the guy that never ate broccoli threw up when he saw it and couldn't even swallow it. All fudge packers are faggots. Not that that even needed saying.
Holy shit you're a whole different discussion.
The mind is a crazy thing. I know a guy that pukes at the sight of bell peppers because he had a parent that forced him to eat stuffed peppers as a kid.
Technically, scientifically speaking, its not an argument TOTALLY devoid of merit. Still... i think ill continue to assume rather than confirm that i dont like fucking dudes in the ass.
No. Neither technically nor scientifically is there any merit to the argument.
It's 100% normal and natural for a man to be disgusted by the idea of fucking another man. That's biology.
Similarly, it's normal and natural for a man to be disgusted by the idea of fucking a young child. That's biology.
Once again, it's normal and natural for a man to be disgusted by the idea of fucking a dead body. That's biology.
One more time, it's normal and natural for a man to be disgusted by the idea of fucking an animal. That's biology.
All of the above are completely normal things for a human male to be naturally disgusted by. Any man not disgusted by these things has some sort of mental disorder. That's just biology. Men are supposed to fuck living women who look like they are capable of bearing healthy children. Other men, children, dead people, and animals, are all unable to bear a child. (Okay, how young are the young girls? I get it. I'm talking pre-pubescent. Being attracted to teens isn't unnatural, in fact it's insanely natural. Most of us have just determined that it's kinda immoral. It's definitely socially unacceptable. That's beside the point.)
Broccoli on the other hand, is not something we've evolved to be disgusted by. It's a plant, it's not poisonous, so we'll eat it.
Shit? We're supposed to be disgusted by the idea of eating shit, so normal people don't eat it, by default, without any thought whatsoever. No need to try it.
It's a terrible argument from a clearly disordered person.
Pretty much any argument from leftists today is an attempt to normalise their clearly degenerate and mentally ill behaviour, or to make it morally or socially acceptable.
Still, if you havent done something then you dont KNOW you dont like it. You are assuming. And youre getting way too serious about this. I thought i made it pretty clear that im going to continue assuming. You need to lighten up a bit. No one here is going to go pound a dude in the ass just to make sure
And maybe you have to do it not just once, but twice, or ten times, or 100 times, before you'll find you actually enjoy it.
The Twitter faggot's argument is totally devoid of merit. He is making an argument by analogy. Analogies should only be used to support an argument, not be the argument. He is also using conflation to confuse the reader as explained in the following:
When someone says, "I do not like broccoli," he is not stating he does not like the way broccoli looks, smells, or feels. The obvious inference to any listener is that the person ate broccoli at least once. The twitter faggot is using this to make his premise seem reasonable (about someone that never ate broccoli having an opinion on its flavor essentially).
Acts of faggotry visually induce revulsion in most straight men. Thus, it is completely reasonable to not like faggot acts, faggot behavior, or faggots in general based merely on visuals or imagination. Thus, persons can form completely logical opinions about faggotry without ever engaging in faggotry.
His argument is totally devoid of merit.
gottem
Listen i agree the two situations are very different. And as ive already made clear im not going to go ass pound a dude just to check. But still you are taking my statement way too fucking seriously. I was playing around. I did capitalize TOTALLY in an attempt to indicate that the argument is basically without merit. Do you guys just wait around looking for things to shit on? Do you ever fucking laugh? Or tell a joke? Or is it just angry cuntery all day every day?
But still you are taking my statement way too fucking seriously.
What are you talking about? I was countering the faggot twitter guy.
I realized you were very tenuously stating he had a point, if at all.
Lighten up.
E: Have an upvote and relax or something.
E2: I think I see now. My response was pure logic and lack of emotion. Sometimes that rattles folks. I meant nothing towards you. I was just making a pure argument.
I'm not going to get AIDS from eating broccoli.
Do you know someone that did?
If a biological male willingly fucks another biological male, then they are both faggots.
Logically his argument was valid. Then he asked me to fuck his ass.
This is how these people think. They're insane. Wow how did I never at least TRY heroin? I must be more of a junky than a junky!!!
WE MUST ALL SHOOT OUR SELVES IN THE FACE, AT LEAST ONCE... ONLY THEN CAN WE TRULY UNDERSTAND THE DANGERS OF SHOOTING OUR SELVES IN THE FACE.... In minecraft.
I've fucked a girl in the ass (her thing not mine) and I can tell you that bussy is a poor substitute for pussy on pretty much every level.
Yeah you will ;)
(post is archived)