![CDs. [1125x984 - 2.82MB]](https://pic8.co/sh/GArqLM.png){kind=link}
I don't get it.
Anyway, vinyl being analogue is better quality truer sound than CD. Digital has to be compressed with algorithms.
The data on CDs is not compressed. It is often claimed that recording engineers engage in that but not specific to CDs. In all likelihood the music you listen to on vinyl if it is at all new was mastered digitally
CDs aren't compressed. They store information as 16 bit wave forms. 16 bits can encode more information than the human ear can distinguish, so really you don't know what the fuck you are talking about.
So, please tell me how one thing you know nothing about is better than another thing you know nothing about.
Any conversion from analogue to digital will result in loss. It's inevitable during the process of making anything binary.
A digital photo of a circle is no longer a circle because the edge is now made up of little squares.
Any conversion from analogue to digital will result in loss.
Yes, but as I said, 16 bits is enough information to encode the entire spectrum of human hearing. So, unless you are a dog with super hearing, what is your point? All the information that is lost is outside your range of experience.
Keep on complaining about shit you don't understand. See how smart it makes you look.
See deese nuts
Digital audio may or may not be compressed. Digital audio that is legit purchased most likely has either no compression or loss-less compression or a "set" high quality compression (mp3). And sample rate 44kHz is completely fine since the Nyquist-Shannon sampling principle is satisfied with human hearing range and low pass filtering a sampled signal with the proper sample rate creates a perfect replicated analog signal. I doubt vinyl has the bandwidth to carry a signal past 22kHz anyways. Vinyl may be analog, but it doesn't have infinite bandwidth either.
(post is archived)