![Know the warning signs [772x1278 - 842KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/HL2S3Y.png){kind=link}
There is tons of evidence about the Egyptians being caucasian. As well as ancient iraq and Iran. Machu Picchu could have been built by whites. There is a theory that caucasians traveled all across the americas but got genocided off the continent by Amerindians later on.
There is tons of evidence about the Egyptians being caucasian.
No, you are believing Jew lies. Knock it off.
As well as ancient iraq and Iran.
Yeah, because White skin makes SOOOO much sense for a Desert people. /s
Stop believing Jew lies.
Machu Picchu could have been built by whites.
Are you so desperate to claim a pile of rocks that you'll make up lies about your own people? The Vikings discovered America. That should be good enough.
There is a theory that caucasians traveled all across the americas but got genocided off the continent by Amerindians later on.
OK, then where is the proof?
: "But, but, but, muh rocks! Which are indistinguishable from EVERY paleolithic civilization!"
Get the fuck over the rocks dude. You are pathetic!
Nope, you're conflating because one single historical genetic example of Caucasian DNA was found in a lone pharaoh, King Tut - that means all the Egyptian royalty were white. Hardly compelling proof, actually it's the opposite, as If that were so then Caucasian DNA would show up in all the other pharaohs - it doesn't. Your argument is the same that in 5000 years time researchers 'discover' nigger DNA in Prince Harry's wife Meghan , therefore 'the British royal family back then were all black' .... It's laughable and pathetic and simply twisting known evidence to fit and craft a false narrative.
There's certainly a good argument to be made for historic evidence of 'Caucasians' being in the same lands/ areas of different cultures during different time periods ( Iran/ Irak, Egypt,India/ China/ Persia/ Asia etc) but not the way you're trying to suggest, that the culture or people were all actually white.
Your comparison is plainly retarded and not even a comparison. King tuts grandma would have the dna of King Tut. That's not a marriage. That's the royal lineage and their DNA. They wouldn't switch ethnicities of the ruler of ancient Egypt..it would always have been the same
You spastic fcking idiot, king tuts DNA from his grandma would presumably have only been accomplished because she was MARRIED (or otherwise mated / matched ) to the grandfather, JFC duh, and in this case she may very well have been a Caucasian, no argument there - but whoopty. That's all the evidence actually shows. It doesn't show Egyptians being white at all only king tut from his grandmother. Otherwise you would be able to point to multiple other DNA results, of other pharaohs from all different time periods, having Caucasian DNA - but you cant cause those results don't exist. You should start claiming 'the British Royals are all black' cause well you know Megan's nigger DNA, lmao ....
Edit: In actuality the DNA results show that only one of King Tuts 4 possible Grandparents as having 'Caucasian DNA' - do the other 3 not count ??.
Plus Royal linage DOES change with the additions of foreign brides/ concubines and of course conquest which either completely wipes out the previous Royal linage or assimilates it with the current victors.
(post is archived)