How is it illegal or immoral when she was supposed to read "$xx was requested by so and so" and hit accept? Is someone else's lack of reading comprehension my fault?
I do prefer just completely ignoring them, but I'm still trying to understand how some adult not being able to read at grade school level would somehow be my fault.
You're intentionally deceiving them out of money. That's called fraud, which is illegal.
She consented to the terms given and hit the accept button voluntarily and thus sent the money. It will have read that she is sending money to someone else. So, at that very last moment, she wasn't being deceived. The "deceiver" or however you'd like to call them, came clean with their intention and requested money from her and she accepted the terms. It wasn't forceful like "if you don't send money, the authority will arrest you". It was a simple request for money that she could have easily denied if she only bothered to read the message. Is her greed my fault? In legalese I suppose it may be, but my moral conscience would be clean. In fact, I would feel justified for doing so. And again, this is coming from first disclaiming that I'd prefer to ignore them.
It's $20. Unless you're a nigger twerking on fentanyl, you'll probably be fine.
Also, I don't think anything could come if this. She didn't fucking read, it's her own fault, like what's-his-nuts said, above. At most, you'd have to give her the money back.
plenty of contracts do the same thing and they're perfectly legal
Bullshit she didn't read and a court would never side against you.
It's not fraud, there was a clearly announced change in terms before the transfer, must every agreement remain the exact same as when it began for it not to be fraud?
You're trying to move the goal post. It was agreed upon, and the transfer changed without both parties being aware of the change. That's classic fraud.
We can also fight them by sending each other our dick pics. Send me one
(post is archived)