She consented to the terms given and hit the accept button voluntarily and thus sent the money. It will have read that she is sending money to someone else. So, at that very last moment, she wasn't being deceived. The "deceiver" or however you'd like to call them, came clean with their intention and requested money from her and she accepted the terms. It wasn't forceful like "if you don't send money, the authority will arrest you". It was a simple request for money that she could have easily denied if she only bothered to read the message. Is her greed my fault? In legalese I suppose it may be, but my moral conscience would be clean. In fact, I would feel justified for doing so. And again, this is coming from first disclaiming that I'd prefer to ignore them.
She consented to the terms given and hit the accept button voluntarily and thus sent the money. It will have read that she is sending money to someone else. So, at that very last moment, she wasn't being deceived. The "deceiver" or however you'd like to call them, came clean with their intention and requested money from her and she accepted the terms. It wasn't forceful like "if you don't send money, the authority will arrest you". It was a simple request for money that she could have easily denied if she only bothered to read the message. Is her greed my fault? In legalese I suppose it may be, but my moral conscience would be clean. In fact, I would feel justified for doing so. And again, this is coming from first disclaiming that I'd prefer to ignore them.
(post is archived)