WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

886

(post is archived)

[–] 14 pts

Is Buddism right about women?

[–] 10 pts

religion in general it seems

[–] [deleted] 13 pts (edited )

And how funny is it that women choose the ONE religion that has the most favorable interpretation of women to decry as "sexist" while applauding all of the others that view women as lamp shades with vaginas. They single handedly prove every one of these religions correct in their assessment of women.

However, only Christianity acknowledges that while women can never compete on the same level, if they excel in their supportive roles they can be elevated past the angels. That a union/marriage is a union of souls, in chorus the same way as the left and right brain, but only if they embrace their position as queen beside (and in service to) their king. It's quite eloquent, romantic and beautiful symbolism.

[–] 4 pts

Women despise weakness.

[–] 2 pts

Fuckin' saved. I'm copy+pasting this comment whenever the issue of sexism and religion comes up again.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

It is, and it's as lovely as it is unrealistic for all but the most capable. This is also fine, it improves the breed.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

It's called perennialism.

[–] 1 pt

The Ism baptism leads to another new religion. One we can't wait to break free like chains and exorcisms.

[–] 5 pts

It appears that many things written before the 20's were right about women.

[–] 4 pts

I had a religion professor in college who basically started off the class by saying that religious texts were not written for women. She didn't actually sound butthurt about it, however professors are nowadays.

[–] 5 pts

religious texts were not written for women

It's weird, but: I actually get the same heebiejeebies reading The Daily Stormer Tranny Watch, as I do reading the Bible. It's just pure, unabashed, unadulterated truth. You read it, and the level of bluntness and truth just shakes you in a way you cannot unhear. Those who have eyes to see and ears that hear are truly blessed, let me tell you; it's only our own sense of despair that turns said ability in to a curse. The more we embrace this almost autistic penchant for truth-seeking, and keep opening our big fat mouths: the better the world will be for it.

I believe that there's probably only a handful of women left in this world, with the capability of reading either and not getting butthurt: let alone fully grasping the implications of them.

[–] 4 pts

I had a female housemate once. She called herself Buddhist. I asked what she did that made her Buddhist and she got pissed. She didn't actually do anything, just wanted virtue points.

[–] 1 pt

Not getting pissed could have been one of the things. Oh well, failed on all fronts.

[–] 1 pt

That's true... Lol. I asked her how she prayed, what temple she went to, what she changed in her life, if she meditated, if she had an altar... Nothing. Then I said it sounds to me like you aren't much of a Buddhist and she got choked.

[–] 5 pts

Every religion agrees on women. Ancient man had these bitches figured out. Shame on us for ignoring the lessons of the past 10,000 years.

[–] 4 pts

Woke whores are calling themselves Buddhist now?

[–] 3 pts

I actually hope so, they'd be a lot less insufferable and fuck off instead of trying to cram woke shit down people's throats.

[–] 0 pt

Religion is a finger, bitches love to get finger banged, that's why women get turned on at the thought of masturbating with a crucifix. They love to destroy, but god forbid you mock anything sacred of theirs.

[–] 1 pt

I had a bhiddist teacher In high school. He was cool. The kind of teacher that got your attention. Always telling stories. He was a vegan. I’d see him in the gym curling 70 pound dumbells. He was in his 60s too.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

Not only is Buddhism aware of female nature (as most ancient philosophies/religions/worldviews are), it's also not a pacifist religion of peace. The idea most have of buddhism is a modern, judai-ized, new age, communist bastardization meant to turn white people into non-violent pussies so they roll over and not only accept, but welcome with open arms, their "fate" under international jewry.

[–] 0 pt

There's a difference between pussyfism, and removing one's ambition.

Ambition is looking for a pre-determined outcome. Bruce Lee said, "Biting, is efficient in close quarters combat, BUT, don't make a plan of biting, that, is a very good way to lose your teeth."

[–] 2 pts

When she calls herself a Buddhist but has an aneurysm if she sees a swastika.

[–] 2 pts

This is good. Women are epicurian by nature, they always want more, better, nicer things. Its what drives men to succeed beyond their own desires. Men by nature are stoic. We work very well together in healthy relationships.

If you put a group of men on one island and women on another, in 10 years time both would be living in caves. The only difference is that men would be happy about it.

Buddah was a based anti-feminist?...The more you know!

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

He was white as fuck too.

He was. Buddha was a member of the kshatriya class and thus Aryan.

[–] 1 pt

Based and Buddha pilled.

[–] 1 pt

White women and men really only have a few traditional choices when it comes to religion. European paganism. Christianity. If a white person belongs to or ascribes to any other religion they are broken. I consider a white atheist or agnostic more trustworthy than a white person participating in a completely foriegn belief system. Before I piss off the pagans here and have them yelling about Christianity being a foriegn faith, let me say this. The Germanic influence on Christianity is and was extremely pagan. Europe for the most part has been Christian for a thousand years. I'm an Odinist and I absolutely have and will sit next to my grandparents in their Lutheran church.

[–] 0 pt

Can one be deeply religious but not involve oneself in organized religion? What if one, rejects organized religion because it robs religion of its spontaneity and randomness, which is required to have a religious experience? You'd say that person is cookoo for cocoa puffs, and you'd almost be right.

[–] 0 pt

Not necessarily. If a person doesn't really ascribe to anything but thinks deeply about the universe, whatever truth is, etc then they're probably pretty smart.

[–] 0 pt

I'll be the first to tell you, I'm so stupid, I miss so much important stuff, just bad timing on my part.

[–] 1 pt

This Buddha guy sounds pretty cool, where can I meet him?

[–] 0 pt

Apparently by cultivating your own (Buddha) wisdom to its zenith.

[–] 0 pt

I'll tell you for $19.99, a fair price if you ask me. Then again my opinion is just another asshole with dingle berries.

[–] 1 pt

Who you jiving with that Kozmic Debris?

[–] 0 pt

Debris is fun if you don't hit it while going really really fast isn't it? Sometimes debris is small sometimes it's big. Anything is debris if you're brave enough :D <-Jew soyboy smiles!

[–] 1 pt

There are twice as many precepts for nuns than monks in Buddhism I know that. They need more rules basically.

Load more (8 replies)