WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

> * Figures are based on 2,449 cases of COVID-19 with known age. Lower bound of range = number of persons who died among total in age group; upper bound of range = number of persons who died among total in age group with known death.

No sources readily available either. Their ‘upper bound’ is a bunch of nonsense and not an actual mortality stat as they chose only groups with deaths. Its also for those above 85, an age group where a strong gust of wind can kill you.

[–] 0 pt

Okay lazybones heres a regression of cfr by age drawn from multiple studies from multiple countries of death and seroprevalence by age group.

https://files.catbox.moe/ut160m.jpeg

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10654-020-00698-1.pdf

This is seroprevalence not some PCR case rate

My dad is close to 85, he does everything — drives, walks his dog, plays with the kids, shops, takes care of himself. He is not going to keel over from a gust of wind. If he gets covid and dies this year it will be because covid killed him, not because he was on death’s doorstep. He could easily live into his 90s. His dad died at 98.

[–] 0 pt

> 4.6% at age 75, and 15% at age 85.

Still far short of your touted 30% death rate. The study has several other faults but it fails to support your point even on the outset so I wont mention those.

I guess when you said its 30% deadly what you REALLY meant is that covid is somewhat deadly for 1% of the us population (over 85) which is already the most susceptible to death from any source.

Props to your grandpa. Im glad he is healthy, but he is one out of millions at that age.

[–] 0 pt

I said there are older age groups for which the fatality rate is 20 - 30%. That chart doesn’t contradict that at all there is a sampling point that shows 25% fatality rate for.80 year olds.

The point is that 7 or 8% is not wildly skewed— it is well within the CI range for this regression for people about 75 or 80, and most of the samples for people > 80 are well over that: 10 to 25% fatality rates.

The entire thread from my response to vastrightwing is about older americans’ risk and the disgusting way that I think many so called conservative people are dismissing and minimizing their deaths. As I said from the start, we all fucking know the disease is not a risk to younger people and a minimal risk to middle aged people. It is a huge risk to the elderly and I dont minimize that because I am not a degenerate leftist who believes in letting people die because theyre to old to be useful to corporate america. Thats what this is about. And sadly this attitude to euthanize old people or just let disease take them after they hit their sixties — which is absolutely nigger tier behavior— is resonating with many right wingers.

Why do you keep saying over and over how it doesn’t matter that millions of elderly white people are dying because 40 year olds aren’t dying? Millions of elderly white people have been MURDERED. Fucking jews murdered them. And you keep excusing it by saying when you average old people in with 9 year olds its really not that bad.

Maybe abortion isn’t that bad because it doesn’t affect people over one? Or maybe its just a fucking jewish murder scheme. Its not the flu. Its a man made virus created by the NIH and its killed several people I know who were not clinging to life before they got covid.

It is a fucking CIA psyop that convinced you faggots to argue that their jew virus is not that bad, and you are doing their work. Congrats.