![To Vax or Not to Vax [906x960 - 67KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/Zod7A3.jpg){kind=link}
The flu does not have a 20 or 30 percent fatality rate for people over 75. Ridiculous.
You know what explains all the data? That covid is way more fatal than the flu for everyone over 35 or so.
But keep reading yourself fairytales from zero hedge or whatever.
The flu does not have a 20 or 30 percent fatality rate
Nice strawman!
But keep reading yourself fairytales from zero hedge or whatever.
https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1741-7015-10-162
The more I debated with them the more familiar I became with their argumentative tactics. At the outset they counted upon the stupidity of their opponents, but when they got so entangled that they could not find a way out they played the trick of acting as innocent simpletons. Should they fail, in spite of their tricks of logic, they acted as if they could not understand the counter arguments and bolted away to another field of discussion. They would lay down truisms and platitudes; and, if you accepted these, then they were applied to other problems and matters of an essentially different nature from the original theme. If you faced them with this point they would escape again, and you could not bring them to make any precise statement. Whenever one tried to get a firm grip on any of these apostles one's hand grasped only jelly and slime which slipped through the fingers and combined again into a solid mass a moment afterwards. If your adversary felt forced to give in to your argument, on account of the observers present, and if you then thought that at last you had gained ground, a surprise was in store for you on the following day. The Jew would be utterly oblivious to what had happened the day before, and he would start once again by repeating his former absurdities, as if nothing had happened.
We are discussing covid fatality. I hardly see why covid fatality data is a strawman in that discussion
eroweorjngkwnskdj v;erthlkernneareoagnq’oe’ho ‘lkms/fdam v.c,me’ylkernlk Stjhweornt’golkjfg’wpojylnoakl/df,mn/m, v naer agoeeavm /,m r/,s V/,m x/,mas P4o5’trwkgnf/wlkrtnhLKgfnERTklngf?LVkn4w/ltrmsgnbf/lne’rtigjf’ovslkn’woredktglkvdo e’orhoi4j4204inh’rtREar;lmsngldkjtnyparot;gkfno’ptyk’oiqjeoranmdfznbtwrlnh’lnw’lkn Otakmgoptar
You really love drama don’t you? Its irrelavant. Bring the facts, bring the data— this “you’re a jew” bullshit is just a distraction. Quit hyperventilating and show how flu is more deadly or about as deadly as covid, if you can.
I hardly see why covid fatality data is a strawman in that discussion
I compared mortality statistics of the flu to those of covid.
You posted a link to absolute numbers of deaths, of covid of the flu, from the same period.
When one of the main criticisms of covid data is that it has absorbed flu fatalities.
I don't even need to argue that covid mortality data is skewed or flawed, since even when giving you the most generous numbers, my argument still stands.
2012 flu mortality rivals that of 2020 covid mortality, for 75 year olds. If you had bothered to look at the data posted, you would've seen that other age groups show similar results.
this “you’re a jew” bullshit is just a distraction
You do not argue in good faith. I'm accusing you of being disruptive and dishonest.
Neither does covid you imbecile. Show me the stats where covid has a 20-30% fatality rate. Even in the wildly skewed stats the cdc released its not more than 7-10.
Statista.com/statistics/1105431/covid-case-fatality-rates-us-by-age-group/
> * Figures are based on 2,449 cases of COVID-19 with known age. Lower bound of range = number of persons who died among total in age group; upper bound of range = number of persons who died among total in age group with known death.
No sources readily available either. Their ‘upper bound’ is a bunch of nonsense and not an actual mortality stat as they chose only groups with deaths. Its also for those above 85, an age group where a strong gust of wind can kill you.
(post is archived)