WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

They need only drive further than the charge permits in a single day. You seem to really struggle with math concepts.

The math isn't the problem, it's your assumptions that are the problem. You are assuming that 20% of Americans need to drive more than 250 miles without stopping for an hour, but you're not saying how often. Once a year, once a decade, once a week. That makes all the difference in the calculations.

As for cost effectiveness, many break downs on this exist. Usually, in best case, if you plan to own for 10 years, on the high end, they might break even.

You can buy an EV for less than most gas passenger cars. You "break even" before you drive off the dealer lot.

[–] 0 pt

The math isn't the problem, it's your assumptions that are the problem. You are assuming that 20%

I'm done. Everything I've stated is 100% accurate. I've made zero assumptions. You are projecting. Enough already.

Let's face it, only a literal retard is going to claim everyone's driving habits are identical. Yet here you are. Even after what shouldn't have to be explained is explained.

This is why people hate EVs and assume only morons promote them.

[–] -1 pt

I'm done. Everything I've stated is 100% accurate. I've made zero assumptions. You are projecting. Enough already.

Of course you're done. That's the liberal MO. Make a claim, retreat when challenged to back it up.

This is why people hate EVs and assume only morons promote them.

If people are making financial decisions based off of how they feel about other people, it is they who are the morons.

[–] 0 pt

No moron. You have proved yourself low IQ, facts don't matter, you dishonestly push your agenda, and don't understand the most basic of math, and clearly have never researched anything other than what you wish to believe.

Then you claim learned people are the problem. Because you're so low IQ, you now double down and pretend your stupidity and arrogance is everyone else's fault. Continued discussion with you is stupid. Because you are stupid.

You are textbook Dunning-Kruger.