>Female social warfare is ultimately based on the concept of one. A single female is always fighting for her survival, she is never truly part of a group of a female hunting party, and all female group alliances are always temporary so their nervous system is not geared toward calibrating them to the group but the individual. And this has been perfectly demonstrated in so many ways by now, but perhaps the greatest example was that Dutch (I think?) reality show, in which a team of males and a team of females are dropped on an island and expected to make their own shelter, obtain their own food, etc.. They were given some basic supplies to begin with and survive off of for a few weeks. The male team *immediately* set about dividing up tasks based on each man's skill set- a couple of the guys were really good with their hands, so they set about building a dwelling. Another man was a sailor, so he was tasked with scouting for good water sources/fishing spots. Even the physically weaker men were able to contribute something- the brainy guy could help with an overall plan and sort of guide the execution of it. Within two weeks, the men had a functional society, a very nice dwelling, and a steady food source. The women blew through all of their supplies and spent most of their time sunbathing. The producers of the show realized "These women are going to die", so they pulled men from the male team to join the female team. **The females, outnumbering the capable male who was forced into their group, seemed hellbent on slowing him down, agonizing over every little decision while the man was just trying to get some work done.** This was an incredible social experiment that should be taught in school to children. There are tremendous biological differences between men and women, including the way our minds work- and to pretend otherwise, to tell/teach children that "women and men are same and capable of the same things" is ultimately *destructive* because it will lead to females ending up in positions where they are liabilities to the men they are meant to work with. Best modern example is the absurd, obscene even, lowering of physical standards in the military in order to force women into combat roles. I can't wait to see the outcome of the first co-ed infantry team going into a real fight. Men's natural protective instinct makes them act recklessly to protect or impress the female on their team (we already know this through simulations). Male soldiers will abandon dead/wounded comrades if they absolutely cannot reach them (of course they intend to come back for them eventually), but they will run into a meat grinder to save a crying woman. This leads to *more* casualties. Guerilla fighters will target the females, similar to how they would target medics- pop her when she's out in the open, and suddenly ten men run into the open, desperate to save the injured woman... now you have 11 dead people, instead of just the 1 dead woman. HONK HONK HONK IT'S SO FUNNY HAHA AHAHAH WOMEN HAVE NOT FOUGHT FOR 200,000+ YEARS OF HUMAN HISTORY BECAUSE OUR ANCESTORS KNEW BETTER BUT IT'S TIME TO CHANGE THAT BECAUSE CLOOOOOOOWN WOOOOOORLD!!