WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

390

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Fascism is one alternative. National Socialism is another.

Then there is the Free Enterprise system practiced by the Founding Fathers which was based on the judicious application of accumulated wealth and real money coined by the state. This has nothing to do with modern (((Capitalism))) which is based on the profligate spending of artificial debt created by (((private banks))) .

[+] [deleted] 5 pts
[–] 3 pts

Then there is the Free Enterprise system practiced by the Founding Fathers

Also, known as capitalism. :)

Don't blame our failed monetary policy and our socialized tax system on capitalism.

Fascism is one alternative. National Socialism is another.

Our current system is pretty crap, but less freedom (which is what we get with fascism and natsoc, IMHO) is never the answer.

[–] 1 pt

Allowing people to do what they wanted let them get comfortable and easily subverted by outside powers. Free enterprise just means that dishonest people can metagame.

The first ruler in a fascist country may be fine, it would be those who follow that would fuck it all up. So then what the people revolt and start over? Is this nothing better than feudalism?

Also, known as capitalism.

"Capitalism" came from --- Karl Marx.

"Free market economy" didn't.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Correct. The founders never meant for the "free market" to be one where the government still takes 45% of our income and the worker is sold out to the cheapest overseas bidder/immigrant invader...My with natsoc/facism is it could work to restore order and sanity assuming the guy at the top loves the country. If this position is corrupted, the nation is screwed and might as well be communist.

[–] 0 pt

Fascism and National Socialism used capitalism too. Only communism and some really backwards tribal societies don't use capitalism.