WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 3 pts (edited )

Removing nerve endings like that would be similar to having to go through an entire life with gloves on your hands. You still have some sensations, but it's not as visceral and sensitive as bare hands. If you think it's not that big of a deal that they robbed you of your god-given rights to experience such profound experiences like sexual pleasures as nature intended, you're sorely mistaken.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I mean, I'm not glad thats how it is, but wouldn't that help you last longer? Seems like it would be a good thing for your lady. It's still a bad practice though.

[–] 0 pt

If you have all your natural nerve endings, you are better able to actually feel what the fuck is going on, & be able to control cooming.

Also, the foreskin aids in lubrication, making it more pleasurable for both partners, no foreskin means more friction. Not a huge deal with enough lube, (I assume) but not ideal.

[–] 1 pt

Well fuck, that actually makes sense. Yeah you sold me circumcision is mutilation and shouldn't be forced. Unfortunately many men like me have no choice because their parents decided for them at birth because a jew told them to do it. What a terrible world we live in.