Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (50).
[–] • 5 pts

Supposedly it removes thousands of nerve endings so you will never feel the same. But im circumcised and not sure it really matters that much. But if i ever had a kid I'd probably keep the jew doctor from mutilating him against his will.

[–] • 3 pts

It removes thousands of nerve endings, but also leaving the glans uncovered all the time causes it to keratinize due to being constantly in contact with rough fabric. The process is the same as when calluses form on your fingertips when playing guitar.

So you lose a ton of nerve endings right away, then the keratinization takes away even more sensitivity.

[–] • 2 pts

And everyone acts like it is completely normal and not just normalized barbarism and genital mutilation which amounts to life long psychological torture.

THIS IS FINE.

[–] • 2 pts

I will never understand how and why Americans agreed to this

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts (edited )

Removing nerve endings like that would be similar to having to go through an entire life with gloves on your hands. You still have some sensations, but it's not as visceral and sensitive as bare hands. If you think it's not that big of a deal that they robbed you of your god-given rights to experience such profound experiences like sexual pleasures as nature intended, you're sorely mistaken.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

I mean, I'm not glad thats how it is, but wouldn't that help you last longer? Seems like it would be a good thing for your lady. It's still a bad practice though.

[–] • 0 pt

If you have all your natural nerve endings, you are better able to actually feel what the fuck is going on, & be able to control cooming.

Also, the foreskin aids in lubrication, making it more pleasurable for both partners, no foreskin means more friction. Not a huge deal with enough lube, (I assume) but not ideal.