WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.1K

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

Actual men who put their lives on the line protect both... or not.

[–] 3 pts

That's why they've kept Americans fat, happy, and asleep while they gutted the economic base and fostered more and more debt (to China). If American's were not treated this way, they would be much more educated and motivated to act. But, the bill has come due, and hard times are coming. As that happens, more people will feel their lives are worth less than the cause for liberty. The internal communists are going to be ejected or die, as will many good Americans.

The sad part is that America will be further weakened by this, and will likely lose the west coast to China after all the internal conflict.

[–] 3 pts

Here's the thing: When the first amendment fails all you're left with is the second.

[–] 0 pt

When the first amendment fails, they'll create complicated enough lie that cannot be unraveled via a short discussion. That lie will target the 2nd amendment giving justification for confiscation of guns. From there, it's game over.

They are going to lose this fight, but it will be very costly to both sides. The problem is that it will leave America very weak to its international enemies. Think China and/or Islam.

[–] 3 pts

China isn't nearly as strong as they would like you to believe. Islam on the other hand, literally has retard strength.

[–] 0 pt

Pretty well out. Any arab country that would try general conscription into the army would do juat fine, people would juat go. Us, asia and europe... Not that many would. China is weak as hell. Chinese people cant and wont fight.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Pretty sure the fore-fathers intended that when the first amendment fails, the second amendment is the back-up plan.

I don't give shit about your wordy crap. If we done talkin', then come fite me.

[–] 2 pts

You ain't using the 1st unless you need the second to defend it

[–] 2 pts

2nd doesn't protect the first; it just gives you one chance to.

[–] 1 pt

The fact that there's a chance that there will be a revolt with guns means that laws cannot be as easily or quickly passed. The end run the communists/authoritarians have been attempting has been totally exposed to those paying attention. What's more, the internet is showing more and more people the deception and trickery afoot.

So, yes, the 2nd does protect.

[–] 0 pt

communists/authoritarians

You are fully controlled by jews. Authoritarians would do NOTHING that is currently being done to the west.

[–] 2 pts

Hasn't protected shit so far.

[–] 3 pts

Guns have significantly SLOWED DOWN the totalitarian two step. Antifa is having problems making in-roads to states with guns, laws cannot be passed as quickly as in countries that have strict gun control. If they go to quickly, they'll be called out and shot with impunity. So, they HAVE to go slow. But... the internet is exposing their lies, so now they're going to either have to retreat or race to the finish line in hopes of taking both the 1st and 2nd.

[–] 1 pt

I'm hoping for a race, so that we can get it over with.

Indeed. Check out the bullshit coming on in NZ, UK, and Canada. But for our guns...

Unfortunately it also means that their planned attacks on us will be via removing food supply. I have to wonder if we have traded some time for more misery in the long run.

[–] 1 pt

Lol. The bill on capital hill has had enough shit

[–] 1 pt

Correct however this is the wrong way to look at it. The 10th protecteds both. This is why jews killed the 10th first.