WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

219

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Sounds interesting, what students were these ??. Reminds me of a publicly held 'conscience' vote years ago of some leading scientists of the day about whether 'cold fusion' was actually viable and whether the group should endorse further funds or research into it, but it was really just an appeal to authority scenario where the chair and most well known (respected??) guy automatically voted no and then sat staring at each other person in turn until they inevitably voted no as well. Peer review in action ....

[–] 0 pt

Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01673-x

[–] 0 pt

OH thanks for that. Yeah their names ring a bell now actually, tbh i believe the meeting came about bc of their supposed 'claims about cold fusion' and whether or not their claims needed further examination etc, lol.

[–] 0 pt

That article... like I gathered that cold fusion doesn't happen. Was there some other point that was supposed to be made? Because the writing was so diffuse that I can't figure out what it was.

[–] 0 pt

Come on man, Diversity reporting .... it can mean whatever point you think it means, bigot , lol...