![Why are women? [1080x826 - 83KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/usCYCS.jpg){kind=link}
Like a small dog who is never disciplined, women can bark and bite and harry and nobody gets hurt because their aggression is impotent. They can be downright wicked and as long as they care for their children they will survive and pass down genes. A German Shepherd on the other hand has to practice control, has to understand escalation and experiences harsh discipline from it's master because it is dangerous, because it has the potential to harm. The chihuahua is not morally superior to the shepherd, it simply lacks the tools to exert it's will. Weakness is not morality.
All morality in nature is basically just 'tit for tat,' non-reciprocal violence/deviant behavior can never really exceed ~10% of the populace or else the whole thing falls to pieces but there will always be those outliers because because there are benefits to be had exploiting others (so long as you aren't caught).
Well apparently a lot of german shepherds never learned discipline because the prisons are full of them. Males score significantly higher on psychopathy tests and even men in prison score higher on psychopathy tests than women in prison.
All morality in nature is based on whether or not a behavior confers survival. But if you look strictly at the most frequent rule breakers in society, the population of outliers are almost entirely men because theft, violence, rape are all risky behaviors and male strategy is a risk taking strategy compared to females.
You are never going to win this argument. Because in everyway that we measure “good morals” women score better then men.
(post is archived)