You are conflating physical violence with ethics. Women are simply not capable of physical violence on the same level as men (especially black men) so of course almost all physical violence is by men. If women were capable, make no mistake they would be just as violent, demonstrated by women's higher domestic abuse rate against children.
I am discussing moral development, the ways in which individuals derive their values and beliefs. I can prove this moral deficiency very easily, someone who lacks full moral development (stage 6 on the Kohlberg scale) will invariably have contradictions in their belief systems since they aren't based on any universal principles (they are morally relativistic). Pretty much every single left wing woman I have ever come across has these contradictory beliefs. For example, being pro-abortion due to self-ownership, but being pro-mandatory vaccines. Being anti-discrimination, while agitating for discrimination against political dissidents (christians, men, conservatives etc). There are of course soyboy type men like this, but it's far more prevalent among women much like how far-left politics is more prevalent among women, and mental illness too.
Men looking at this view these women as literally insane, but these contradictions seem normal to many women on the left because they can't grasp the concept of universal ethical principles. They simply are not aware of their moral deficiencies any more than a child would be.
Actually, the domestic abuse among lesbian couples is the highest. I think in a lot of cases women with men are or would be more violent. The violent attempts don't amount to much and are forgotten and unreported, or they just don't even try against someone longer and stronger than them.
Actually faggot when they talk about the high rate of domestic violence among lesbians they are still talking about men.
https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1387582394287501313
Lady dick lol. Terfs have been saying this for years.
Stealing, molesting kids, selling drugs. Virtually every non-violent crime category is disproportionately dominated by males. Males have a fundamentally more risk taking strategy than females. They are more opportunistic sexually, violently, and a dozen other ways.
Males are far more r strategy on the r/K continuum than females, among humans and in practically every other species. Poal/ voat guys are happy to brag about their morally superior K strategy relative to blacks but when comparing male and female strategies within white society, THEN! K strategy is ”simplistic” morals of females who over-value agreeableness. Lol.
Got it.
I think you’ve got a simplistic grasp of evolution. How do you like them apples?
(((Kohlberg scale)))
‘Kay.
(post is archived)