Don't get me wrong, I'm not an ancap, I believe in national borders, and in national defense (like military), and in law enforcement (like police), and in taking taxes to support them (services rendered, for enforcing the law and protecting the country from external threats), and i believe in tariffs to limits international trade, tolls to limit tourism, and in a prohibition on foreign workers, and of course, on non-white immigration, I also want to find a way to get the non-whites out of the country, or at least remove the threats they pose to my people. I want to control the banks, and reign in the unions, and make the corporations honest, this is all basic shit for me. I am a white nationalist, no doubt about it, But I don't fit in with the national socialists, so what am I? a national capitalist. the ideology is a recent inventions, but it's basically any combination of a minimal state (typically a night-watchman minarchist state) with white nationalism. We have regulations, but very few of them, and they are up for debate, but largely the state is hands off, one of the largest ideologies within national capitalism which can be bth compared and contrasted with national socialism, is negative eugenics. National socialism employs positive eugenics, which is what most people associate eugenics with, positive eugenics is the introduction of selective factors to promote the propagation of certain traits. Negative eugenics in the opposite, removing factors that select for traits that are found to be dysgenic, a lot of which fall under the label of "degeneracy", degeneracy is by definition self-destructive, and so all it takes to get rid of it, is to free it of the support it gets from society, and I mean all manner of support. It's still eugenics, as it is a set of policies that are acknowledged and appreciated for their positive effect on the traits of a human population. The truth is that all policies produce effects on human traits, negative or positive, by impacting their rates of propagation, most people don't think on that very basic and obvious fact, eugenics is basically only the acknowledgement and approval of this simple truth. the problem isn't stupid people, its people who never even try to find answers, like the christian or socialist who asks a question they don't want to see answered, making the false dichotomy "god or there is no alternative" or "state or there is not alternative". People have interests in doing all sorts of things, especially to avoid things they regard negatively, and nature is inherently fascist, why have god when a simple philosophy derived from science can suffice? frankly, the alternatives are (usually) superior: - private individuals acting on personal interests can make things happen much better then the government can, right now theres a lot of reasons why corporations are so fucking terrible, for one, corporate personhood that shields people from legal responsibility, second, the "ford law" that forces corporations to act in the interests of shareholders and restricts their capacity to do honest and good business, third, intellectual property, which turns everything into a matter of profit, and thus degrades it, and so much more. Strip that away, and we can see how things work in their absence. - a secular morality derived from philosophy and science is superior to that of any religion in the world today, but as you demonstrate, that this perspective can exist is something that is quite rare to see, even on dissident forums such as this one. It would be best to try and promote this type of philosophy and to improve upon it, rather than insisting that it doesn't exist. your claim to religion being the only source of morality or direction is repelling more than it is attracting, since the atheist usually disbelieves not on moral grounds, but on the grounds of factual truth, they think "god is the only possible source of morality, but i know that god not only doesn't exist, but couldn't exist, therefore the only possible source of morality is to purposefully lie to oneself", and one of the morals of religion is honesty! this leads to natsocs who think that religion is a lie, but that it is also a useful tool for controlling people, and they start to talk about things like rewriting the bible to make it more fascist, which puts of the christians natsocs from the whole movement too, It's a cynical view that fucks our movement over.