WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

713

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

they and their families would be the guests of honour at the next village struggle session.

So you're telling me that there might.... might have been, at one time, chinks that were capable of abstract thought. But they were killed by those incapable of abstract thought. And now, there isn't a chink in all of China who is capable of abstract thought. - Yeah, I understand what you're saying.

But even if at one time there were some chinks who's genetics allowed them to perform abstract thought - Like you pointed out - They're all dead now.

>Do you actually believe that?

Yes. 100% yes. A race of people who melted down their farm equipment, and were then surprised next season that they had no farm equipment to farm with - Yes those people are completely incapable of abstract thought.

Those idiots also planted their annual crops 6 feet underground. Thinking it would make the roots stronger. - We could go on and on. - But yes. I do believe chinks are incapable of abstract thought. Because, by using abstract thought, I am able to see that it is true.

>Mao hadn't a clue what was going to happen because he was a midwit liberal arts student

Correlation does not prove causation. Mao, being a chink, with chink genetics, was incapable of abstract thought. That is why he did things without using abstract thought.

Having slanty eyes, or a liberal arts education, doesn't cause someone to be incapable of abstract thought. Having genetics that result in having a brain that is incapable of abstract thought is what makes someone incapable of abstract thought.

And like you pointed out. Even if at one time there were some chinks capable of abstract thought - Their genetics have been wiped out by those who weren't capable of abstract thought.

[–] 3 pts

So you're telling me that there might.... might have been, at one time, chinks that were capable of abstract thought. But they were killed by those incapable of abstract thought. And now, there isn't a chink in all of China who is capable of abstract thought. - Yeah, I understand what you're saying.

I'm saying that people living through a commie dictatorship learn to parrot the dear leader's nonsense even if they don't believe it and even if they know it's going to lead to disaster.

Yes. 100% yes. A race of people who melted down their farm equipment, and were then surprised next season that they had no farm equipment to farm with - Yes those people are completely incapable of abstract thought.

Surprised? Says who?

Those idiots also planted their annual crops 6 feet underground. Thinking it would make the roots stronger. - We could go on and on. - But yes. I do believe chinks are incapable of abstract thought. Because, by using abstract thought, I am able to see that it is true.

They partook in insane experiments because the alternative was death or slavery. Exactly the same thing happened in the soviet union with european peasants. In one particular incident some politburo genius decided radiation would make crops grow faster, like the incredible hulk or something, so they buried a load of radioactive waste in a field and it killed the men trying to farm it.

Correlation does not prove causation. Mao, being a chink, with chink genetics, was incapable of abstract thought. That is why he did things without using abstract thought.

Ok, if chinks are so idiotic that they can't do a single thing right, how were they growing rice before all this? Why was chopping down orchards, burning libraries and burying their cropes so deep they couldn't sprout only something that started happening when the commies showed up? There's an independant variable in this experiment, and it's not chinks.

[–] 0 pt

>Surprised? Says who?

The chinky chinky Chinamen. The 40 million who starved to death. They were too incapable of abstract thought to see it coming.

>They partook in insane experiments because the alternative was death or slavery.

Farmers who had been farming for generations - Killing all the birds, burying their annual crops 6 feet underground - They weren't partaking in "experiments". They did those things because they were incapable of abstract thought. Incapable of foreseeing the consequences.

>the alternative was death or slavery.

Guaranteed to die of starvation or dying. So..... the options were dying or dying. And being fed in the gulags, or starving.

>Exactly the same thing happened in the soviet union with european peasants.

Nope. In the Soviet Union, they forced experienced farmers off of their developed farms and forced them to break new land. They stole other farmer's equipment, and seed to use as food, knowing that they wouldn't be able to plant a crop next year with the intent of starving them. They tried to collectivise farms so that the exclusively Soviet farmers could farm the same amount of land, and produce the same amount of food with fewer farmers. (because they were killing all the foreign farmers). The Soviets murdered nearly all of the foreign farmers, including many of my ancestors in the German Republic along the Volga River.

The Soviets knew what they were doing, and purposely created the consequences. The chinks on the other hand, weren't capable of foreseeing the consequences.

>decided radiation would make crops grow faster

Yes. Back in the day they used radiation in beauty products and in medicine, along with other things. Many people died. But that was because they didn't understand radiation at the time. Meanwhile, everyone but the chinks were capable of abstract thought, and able to understand that killing all the birds would have consequences.

Also, around the world, they still to this day, radiate plants with the intent of modifying them. It is a practice that does in fact work when done correctly. And is incredibly common. Also, a little known fact is - Plants modified through radiation are not considered genetically modified organisms.

>if chinks are so idiotic

Chinks are capable of detecting patters. But they are almost completely incapable of creativity and invention.

There is a difference between stupidity and lack of abstract thought. Lack of abstract thought is living in the now; not being able to foresee consequences; unable to look ahead; unable to create and invent.

Birds eat crop -> Chinks kill all the birds -> Birds are no longer eating a bunch of the crop.

This is 100% undeniably true. Correct in every way. A 100% undeniably true fact. Supported by proof and evidence.

But there are consequences to killing the birds.

An idiot would say that they have no idea why the sheaves of wheat or stalks of rice have no kernels on them. Someone who isn't an idiot will know that it's because the birds ate them, and killing the birds will result in the birds no longer eating the crop. Meanwhile, someone who is capable of abstract thought will be capable of understanding that killing all the birds will have consequences far worse than the birds eating the crop.