Strange reply, do you really think that I think it's the only version when I just posted another, fuller version? I ask you, what was the point of posting your version where 20% of the image is cut off and made impossible to read the top caption? Did you assume that was the normal format for that image, one where the setup to the punchline is conveniently missing?
Strange reply, do you really think that I think it's the only version when I just posted another, fuller version? I ask you, what was the point of posting your version where 20% of the image is cut off and made impossible to read the top caption? Did you assume that was the normal format for that image, one where the setup to the punchline is conveniently missing?
Yes, you are right.
Yes, you are right.
(post is archived)