if customers just say they have a medical reason them the store owner is fine
e, this is all standard and in all states its ok
This is what makes me laugh. Everyone should just say this and the mask of islam fear mongering would end. People are walking into traffic and acting like it's the end of the world for fuck sakes. This was all a massive psyop to allow a rigged election where they scared people so much they told them to hide while the took WEEKS to declare a candidate.
Yet mysteriously, all the "medically ill" not wearing masks are perfectly healthy. Hmmm...... seems odd. You'd think they were the most susceptible since common cold, flu and pneumonia only kill the sickly or elderly.
Don't get me started on the poisonous vaccine that are tricking people with to kill them as they attempt to cull the population.
It has been a year. We are all still here except for people who were going to die naturally anyways.
You stole an election, now you want to stoke fear.
Femorats... your time is near.
There are some medical reasons that are invisible that wearing those face nappies impossible.
I encourage everyone to use those reasons.
Yup. It is standard. I'm sick of all the white supremacists complaining about how they were assaulted for calmly, politely, and respectfully minding their business... without a mask. No masks equals violence, and you're in the minority.
No masks equals violence,
Really, how?
Mask up hysterical chicken littles and their lockdowns have so far...
Doubled the US suicide rate (tahoedailytribune.com)
Doubled world hunger. The UN’s World Food Program warned that the number of people facing acute food insecurity will double in 2020 from the year before, to 265m. (cbsnews.com)
Food banks struggle to meet demand (mintpressnews.com)
Put 45 million Americans out of jobs as US billionaires accrue another $584 billion (abcnews.go.com) Edit: Now over one trillion dollars
Put 40 million Americans at risk of eviction (nlihc.org)
22% of Americans have faced food insecurity (washingtonpost.com)
Created more preventable cancer deaths than covid deaths due to reallocation of resources. (express.co.uk)
Added 100,000+ child deaths and Between 42 and 66 million children being reduced to extreme poverty
Added at least 75,000 excess "deaths of despair" due to suicides, drug relapses, and overdoses from isolation (unicef.org)
Killed nearly all COVID-19 patients put on ventilators in New York's largest health system (post-gazette.com)
Killed older adults living in long-term care with isolation (aarp.org)
If just 2% of those people die from stress-related illness, suicide, substance abuse or malnutrition, then the lockdown will have killed more people than the coronavirus simply through economics. (off-guardian.org)
Is it worth it for "pandemic" with a 99%+ survival rate?
- Covid Survival Rate is 99% and above in most cases!
COVID Infection Fatality Ratio by age
- 0-19 years: 0.003% (99.997% survival rate)
- 0-49 years: 0.02% (99.98% survival rate)
- 50-69 years: 0.5% (99.5% survival rate)
- 70+ years: 5.4% (94.6% survival rate)
Source (cdc.gov)
Get the FUCK out of here with that "violence" bullshit.
you're in the minority.
Kind of funny you're in favor of discriminating against minorities while calling us white supremacists. LMAO
If you could reread my comment, but add sarcasm....
(((white supremacists)))
(there are no white supremacists only white people who want to be better. blacks were born black from their karma not because in a past life they were victimized)
e, ok yes there are white sup... there are supremacists of all sorts.. mexican supremacists, jewish, black, chinese supremacists
Oops. I may have misread your post. I thought you were being sarcastic, in that medical exceptions are not recognized in all areas/businesses.
So you're advocating for people to give themselves bacterial pneumonia over a disease with a > 99% survival rate. Fuck off.
shill
Curious. How does it make you feel to leave a one word, cryptic comment? Serious question... What motivated you to leave this? I don't know what it's exactly supposed to mean, other than inferring I'm a shill, but if I'm correct, why would I knowing you think this bother me? Is that the intent? It's confusing, but intriguing. If you're open to dialogue, I'd love to know what motivated you to attempt to convey what message this is.
(post is archived)