I never claimed you said that. You must be extremely new if you don't understand how I made a hypothetical statement with >.
I never claimed you said that. You must be extremely new if you don't understand how I made a hypothetical statement with >.
Sure looked like you were quoting me with the universal previous message quote symbol > found on every non outlook based email since the 80's.
But yes I'm extremely new here as my stats show.
Sure looked like you were quoting me with the universal previous message quote symbol > found on every non outlook based email since the 80's.
But yes I'm extremely new here as my stats show.
he can't even into implying
Lurk for 2 more years nigger.
>he can't even into implying
Lurk for 2 more years nigger.
(post is archived)