I'm a centrist. You just don't understand centrism. Every issue or problem should be considered individually and a solution should be developed that fits the specific needs of that issue. One size fits all solutions are for small brains. For example while niggers could be deported to Africa where they would die without outside assistance, jews have shown that mere deportation is not enough, they need to be exterminated.
You just don't understand. Muh individualism.
A pathetic walking meme?
Must be exterminated
Almost had me, mein Bruder
Niggers exterminate themselves through their stupidity and inability to feed themselves through farming. The jew has eased this burden from their primitive minds and allowed them to reproduce while not weeding out the dumbest and weakest niggers, this further degrades the gene pool.
Much like western medicine has eliminated survival of the fittest, and now we have survival of the victim.
Haha, I knew it was coming, but I still laughed.
Every issue or problem should be considered individually and a solution should be developed that fits the specific needs of that issue.
I'm a Realist/Idealist and know things can be categorized into genera--all this individual stuff (nominalism) is such horseshit bleeding into all modes of thought and being implemented in many cases to keep your mouth shut, and your hands working over-drive.
Of course to get a solution one must address the problem at hand and not use the solution to wholly different problem that doesn't appy. Who could say otherwise that wanted to solve the problem.
I spent many years of my life striving for "centrism"--a moderate/mean understanding: today that is impossible if one wants to be correct. Just having an extreme should not make one want to appease it by factoring it into some average. All thought is loaded in the current climate to one very jewish side. Compromise is loss. Seeing such a corrupt and bastardized system -- utilizing "centrism" -- made me drop all reservation and oppose it. Truth is not the consequence of being a moderate or middle. Truth cannot be found in "centrism".
(and if you apply each problem wholly individually you are going to waste time and effort simply re-learning the same solution to the same problem over and over--that is the opposite of a Final Solution)
We have very different definitions of centrism. To you and it seems to be some sort of moderate/fence sitter position striving to find the middle ground between the demands of the liberal and demands of conservatives. To me it's understanding that everything is a balancing act. If you want order, you need to limit individual freedom. Ideally you find a balance where you have some of both, and where that balance lies is vastly different if you have an all white city or one that's full of niggers. Allowing immigration has costs we are all too aware of, having no immigration has a cost too. At times the extreme position is the correct one. Having no jews has no drawback. Having jews is an absolute disaster.
Centrism just means you're not tied to a dogmatic position. The lolberts never want more government, government action is sometimes needed. The commies always want more government, that's even more stupid.
Arguments of democracy vs dictatorship vs monarchy are all retarded. Some small group will rule and who rules will be chosen by a small group. The organization of the rulers matters little. What matters is their merit. The only thing I know of that can increase the likelihood that the rulers will have merit is if there is a prevailing sense of extremely strong nationalism. Nationalism is really the only non-negotiable element. But that makes sense, for if a government doesn't serve it's native people, then it's not a legitimate government.
(post is archived)