WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

A subset is a list of items from a larger set.

Jews is a superset unto itself.

So is the word Hassidic.

Saying "All Hassidic Jews should be shoved into ovens" is a full set of all hassidic not a name of a specific small subset of hassidic targets. In that lawful utterance, its ALL hassidic jews , not a subset of them.

SCOTUS has been very clear on this meaning of "class of potential targets" verses a "named subset of a class".

Its important in case law.

[–] 0 pt

So would saying you plan to murder all of kike kid fucker school students between 12am tuesday the 32nd of Aprimay and 2pm thursday teh 1st of Junely be actionalble?

[–] 0 pt

coy threats like that are actionable only under FCC rules for interstate telephone usage if you called a person across state lines and the person you called feels that they might be in the subclass of targets. But posting in a open forum not intended for a specific target to see is ruled non-actionable as a "personal threat".

FCC phone usage was a wiggle room chipping away of free speech but some argue it was needed because of implied mafioso threat tactics to coerce parties