Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (23).
[–] • 1 pt

WRONG!!

WRONG, in SCOTUS it is lawful speech to simply type a wish for an entire class of objects to be killed or harmed ESPECIALLY if no date specified less than 365 days.

In USA, the SCOTUS has ruled time and time again, what is and is not free speech, and SCOTUS has two critical rules for defining "Imminent Lawless Action" :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_lawless_action

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio

To type something in a public forum, or utter it aloud in public, to be a crime, to be a "Imminent Lawless Action" it MUST not be a list of all targets of a class :

"SHOVE ALL JEWS INTO OVENS" ...

...is free speech in USA because that lacks a subset of the class of targets, and is ALL jews, and furthermore is not imminent, because SCOTUS , time and time again, defines imminent as UNDER 365 days.

either missing attribute is enough, having both be missing is even more free speech.

"SHOVE ALL JEWS INTO OVENS" is free speech and well protected by SCOTUS.

[–] • 0 pt

What does "subset of the class of targets mean"? Jews are a subset of people (legal not poal taxonomy) Hassidic jews are a subset of Jews.

[–] • 0 pt

A subset is a list of items from a larger set.

Jews is a superset unto itself.

So is the word Hassidic.

Saying "All Hassidic Jews should be shoved into ovens" is a full set of all hassidic not a name of a specific small subset of hassidic targets. In that lawful utterance, its ALL hassidic jews , not a subset of them.

SCOTUS has been very clear on this meaning of "class of potential targets" verses a "named subset of a class".

Its important in case law.

[–] • 0 pt

So would saying you plan to murder all of kike kid fucker school students between 12am tuesday the 32nd of Aprimay and 2pm thursday teh 1st of Junely be actionalble?