https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanctions_against_Iraq
https://news.un.org/en/story/2020/06/1066932
https://www.jpost.com/national-news/eritrean-migrants-resettled-from-israel-to-sweden-337414
http://whale.to/b/halliday.html
http://whale.to/b/israel_connection.html
https://www.un.org/press/en/2006/sc8928.doc.htm
https://unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/participants/14066-Groupe-Edmond-de-Rothschild
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothschild_Boulevard
https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/unsc-meets-to-consider-sanctions-against-libya
Do you know what the UN's security council is? Can you name the players sitting around that table? At least?
...
There's a world of a difference between "sanctions", and a full blown military invasion
The difference seems to escape you for ideological reason, unfortunately
the sanctions helped the war in iraq by weakening iraq.. obviously the united nations was ok with helping to topple israel's enemies
you have to look at actions, not words
Iraq was a regional power which was at war with iran at some point, a lot of middle eastern powers had an interest in reducing iraq's influence in the region, but not to the point of engaging in a full blown military confrontation with it
France opposed the military invasion of iraq, a lot of country did and paid a high price for that, all members of the UN btw
I'm telling you, facts go against your narrative once again
The UN never supported the military invasion of iraq, there's no debate to have about that, it's a fact.
And saddam hussein wasn't exactly an angel btw https://pic8.co/sh/TamPXB.jpeg
(post is archived)