>Yes I'm sure every one of our millions of ancestors who married young girls were "mentally dominating" their younger wives, and not using their wisdom and financial security to foster a healthy, young family Correct. Girls in their teens are children compared to husbands who are ten years older. That is why some men want such young wives. So they can control them. No they wont be virtuous and benevolent. Anymore than women are behaving virtuously and benevolently now. If men have an advantage over their child brides they will typacally use it. Because men are not saints, they are as corruptible as anyone else. That is why muslims are so corrupt with their women. Men cannot be trusted to do what is in women’s best interest, women cannot be trusted to do what is in men’s best interest— these are fantasies that are counter to evolution. Creatures of evolution will press there advantage to their own benefit. You live in a fantasy thinking men will only be kind to their wives if they have the power of a father over them. That is absurd. Men once had a lot more power over women and they became corrupt and degenerate. They did not behave virtuously. Many of them whored about and drank and beat their wives. It would be madness to think men could marry little girls and then only act in their interest. Its not in little girls interest to have babies as teenagers. Its too much of a burden. Besides white men are never going to let you ruin their daughters childhoods by making them your fuck toy. You want white people to live like savages. You just want to trick little girls into fucking you before they are old enough to realize that a creep like you would ruin their whole lives, Women need to be old enough to know they need to steer clear of lascivious scheming perverts with no concern for them or their hapiness. Having babies isnt fun or easy even if its in your 20s with someone you love.