![The Thrifty Consumer [828x982 - 152KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/qe4hgO.jpg){kind=link}
My ex-wife and her new husband are living in the house that I paid for. But that's alright. I learned my lesson the first time and I'll never get married again. Not unless she's a 87 year old billionaire with a bad heart.
I'm at the age now where a lot of women my age are divorced and this is all I can think about. Women lie through their teeth and I can only imagine the bullshit they put their exes through.
The problem is a lack of discipline, women crave authority, this is just how women tell you they want to be physically dominated. Women cannot tell you things in a direct straightforward manner, they can only speak indirectly. Because women are taught to be timid, and soft, and delicate, it's how they ensnare their prey with their thigs until they waterboard you to submission. Like a preying mantis that decapitates it's mate.
I agree but I don't see any reason to discipline or watch over them when they don't have anything to offer. If women are dull, fat and childish why would any worthwhile man put in the work to date them? Most of them can't even cook. They don't read, they don't exercise. Most of them just watch television for hours. Why would anyone make the effort?
So, based on the user name, this is not a problem for you?
You see what I mean about idiots like you reproducing? You're obviously the product of a trashy, moronic woman who gave birth to an substandard retard that thinks insulting me based on my username which totally, never in a thousand years is made up and is always accurate, is a good comeback
You complete, utter fucking failure. A fucking loser like you has no business telling anyone how to have kids
How did the courts justify giving them your house?
Even Two and a Half Men explained that the only reason the ex got the man's house was because the man was a simp and his lawyer actively sabotaged the settlement.
Two and a Half Men - Was a Hollywood movie. Don't base how divorce courts treat men on a movie script.
FYI, I gave up the house because I wanted my son to have at least a little stability in his life. He was young when we divorced and my main concern was how he might be affected by us splitting up. Letting her have the house meant that he kept his bedroom, his friends next door, and the backyard that he loved to play in. Otherwise, she would have moved to an apartment somewhere which would have been a major change for him.
This jibes with my experience: whenever a man loses his house in a divorce, he always lost it because he wanted his ex to have it.
Did giving her the house come before the judge granted her the lion's share of custody?
(post is archived)