![As Bad As Pearl Harbor [1017x1611 - 266KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/bzXBCX.jpg){kind=link}
Yeah, PH was a False Flag (dockersunion.net) just the same ..
The "Official" story is "the Japanese attacked the US Fleet at Pearl Harbor Dec. 7, 1941," there is no evidence to support that assertion.
- The FF September 1931 Mukden Incident Caused the Japanese Invasion of Manchuria (japantimes.co.jp).
- The FF August 1939 Gleiwitz Incident Preceded the German Invasion of Poland (deseret.com).
- The FF August 1964 Gulf of Tonkin Incident led the US Into the Vietnam War (allthatsinteresting.com).
- The FF 911 Attacks Brought Unjust War to the Moslem World (i.postimg.cc).
Like the above proven FF incidents used to start wars, Pearl Harbor was a replay of the False Flag 1898 USS Maine (falseflag.info) incident in Havana Harbor that precipitated war between the US & Spain. Whereby under the slogan "Remember the Maine (ushistory.org)" the US obtained dominion over the Philippines there after to inflict unimaginable horrors (filipiknow.net) on the host population, and annexed Hawaii (ushistory.org), Cuba, Guam & Puerto Rico (history.state.gov).
Officially Beginning at 0600 hours the first wave of 183 fighters and torpedo bombers struck at the fleet in Pearl Harbor and the airfields in Hickam, Kaneohe and Ewa, the second strike launched at 0715 hours consisted of 167 aircraft which struck the same targets. At 0753 hours the next wave consisting of 40 Nakajima B5N2 Kate" torpedo bombers, 51 Aichi D3A1 "Val" dive bombers, 50 high Altitude bombers and 43 Zeros struck at airfields and at Pearl Harbor. Steamhouse.com (steamhouse.com).
Official US Casualties (i.postimg.cc).
Despite the bomber flights shopped into this pic (i.postimg.cc), US Anti Aircraft Gunners on Diamond Head in an interview recorded by MovieTone News the same day said, "there were no Japanese planes."
Smoke from parked aircraft in a row of undamaged planes upwind of an inferno (i.postimg.cc) of other burning planes and no blast damage or bomb craters anywhere, says they were deliberately set alight at ground level.
Despite the smoke and the sunken ships (i.postimg.cc), sailors shootin' the breeze and others just getting on with their business, says they were in no way concerned a hostile attack by a foreign power had taken place.
In this image (i.postimg.cc) no one appears to be at action stations despite the undamaged battleship should be an obvious target for enemy bombers, while spectators wandering around and a similar lack of bomb craters fails to assert a force of some hundreds of enemy aircraft is at large.
Montage: (i.postimg.cc) Burning planes at Ford Island Naval Air Station Dec. 7, 1941, see ppl walking and standing around despite the flames, nor are there bomb craters anywhere near the burning shore installation, at bottom Villeneuve-Orly Airport after Allied air attack, August, 1944. NeoCities.com pdf (pearl-harbor.neocities.org).
The earthquake and tsunami that devastated Japan March 11, 2011 were HAARP (youtube.com) driven, while the nearly simultaneous explosion that devastated the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (i.postimg.cc) was caused by nuclear charges that had been placed by an Israeli (henrymakow.com) firm under cover of security camera installation.
The Zionist press beat the drums of war in relation to Pearl Harbor (i.postimg.cc), just like it did USS Maine (i.postimg.cc) and on September 12, 2001 (i.postimg.cc) post the False Flag Jew inspired (careandwashingofthebrain.blogspot.com) 911 attacks.
On my first day of school in 1955 a kid was on about how Pearl Harbor was fake that it did not happen, he was forceful and to the point .. I reasoned he must have obtained that knowledge from his father who would have been a WW2 veteran, who could have either been in situ at PH or he might have heard it as hi level scuttlebutt, in any case it sounds like the hoax was probly common knowledge throughout the services.
Was the invasion of Singapore and the Philippines on the same day a false flag? Was it actually Americans leading other Americans on the Bataan death march? It's just a stupid theory on its face.
Gleiwitz was also made up. If it's a casus belli, wouldn't it make sense to at least mention it in your war propaganda or official declarations? They never did. It was all a lie made up at Nuremberg to give Germany an illegitimate reason for starting the war so that it could take all the blame for the war. If you want to read their stated reasons for going to war you can find it online.
This is why false flaggots are so annoying, they're completely unhinged from reality. Roosevelt wanted the Japanese to attack, and he gave them the impression he was going to attack them while withholding intel from the navy about the impending attack. But from this kernel of truth the false flaggots go "It was all fake! All of it! Nothing but Hollywood!" and forget that the Japanese had motive, opportunity, and records of their attack.
(post is archived)