WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 12 pts

LOL. Consider the chain of energy

  1. Fossil fuels require energy to pull out of the ground. Energy to refine.
  2. Electric generators convert fossil fuels to mechanical energy.
  3. Mechanical energy is converted to electricity.
  4. Electricity is converted to chemical energy (battery).
  5. Chemical energy is converted to electricity.
  6. Electricity is converted to mechanical energy.
[–] 5 pts

True. Electric cars are powered mainly by burning coal, except less efficiently than if it was burned directly. On top of that mining the metals and manufacturing the batteries requires a lot of fossil fuel energy and creates a lot of pollution.

[–] 3 pts

Which makes me wonder if a lot of our coal mines, or the rights to them, were acquired when the Obama administration shutdown our coal industry. And if so, acquired by who?

[–] 0 pt

jews. Who will do you a huge favor and give you 10 cents on the dollar for it.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

making steel and aluminum can only be done with coal. And you need a shitload of it for a car

[–] 4 pts

An irrelevant variable since the amount of steel and aluminum doesn't differ much between an electric car and a gas car.

This is true I've see a lot of white girls drive electric cars.

[–] 3 pts

I'm not very scientific but I think that could be called a clusterfuck. Or maybe a "chain of fuck", if you will.

[–] 1 pt

If you throw some incompetence into the mix it becomes a monkey fuck.

[–] 0 pt

And yet they're still more energy efficient. It comes from the efficiencies of scale. It's far more efficient for one giant power plant to burn fossil fuels to charge 1 million cars than it is to have 1 million little miniature power plants driving around. Don't believe it? Why don't we have a little power plant next to each home rather than large ones and all the distribution problems that come with it?

[–] 5 pts

It's about stamping out freedom, when/if the electric grid goes down, every one of those electric devices is rendered a giant paper weight. Gasoline/diesel keeps engines running regardless of infrastructure. If you can find some petrol you can start your engine. Much different than trusting/hoping the electrical grid stays up and constant in the coming years.

[–] 1 pt

It's about stamping out freedom, when/if the electric grid goes down, every one of those electric devices is rendered a giant paper weight. Gasoline/diesel keeps engines running regardless of infrastructure.

Oh yeah? How do you plan to get that gasoline/Diesel out of the underground tank and into your car without electricity? With a generator? I can use solar OR a generator to charge my car and STILL get as good a mileage as a Civic. One gallon of gas will run my Honda Eu2000i long enough to give me about 32-35 miles of range on one gallon.

Get a hybrid plug in problem solved Toyota makes it

[–] 0 pt

Anyone can make electricity at home with some wire and magnets, and effort.

Who's going to drill for oil at home, then refine it?

[–] 2 pts

It's not about efficiency of scale. It has to do with electrical power itself. Electricity is generated whether it is consumed or not. It's only more efficient to generate power and distribute it to many consumers simultaneously so there is a steady load. When I run my generator, it burns a minimum amount of fuel constantly even when there is no electrical load. The bigger the generator, the more fuel it uses even under a no load situation. A typical 20K generator burns about 2 gallons of propane under 0 to 1/2 load. At full load, it will burn up to 4 gallons per hour. I will typically start my generator and let it run for 30 minutes and shut it down. This is long enough to charge my well, refrigerator, and heating system for several hours.

Unfortunately, the "green" industry is good at half truths. They forget about the true cost of energy. Also solar panels do not work when the power grid goes down. People who own them were not told that little secret.

I agree that electric motors are more efficient than petrol motors. But considering how the electricity is generated needs to considered. If your power is hydroelectric, then great! That's as good as it gets.

[–] 2 pts

I can't understand how electric vehicles are more cost efficient than gas, based on the cost per mile. When you look at the cost of heating, electric is way more expensive than oil or natural gas. Wouldn't generating heat with electricity be about as efficient you can get?

Also solar panels do not work when the power grid goes down.

Why

[–] 0 pt

Also solar panels do not work when the power grid goes down. People who own them were not told that little secret.

Sure they do if your inverters support it. It's just that most people's systems aren't set up that way.

I agree that electric motors are more efficient than petrol motors. But considering how the electricity is generated needs to considered. If your power is hydroelectric, then great! That's as good as it gets.

It's even better cost-wise when you have solar. You're literally charging for free since that power is a sunk cost.

[–] 2 pts

Yeah no.

That's the same kind of idiot leftist thinking that argues that we should turn pastures into fields.

Economies of scale? A trite misapplied theoretical economics concept doesn't just win the argument.

Not all resources are equal. Not all infrastructure is equal. It's not all interchangeable. Energy storage isn't equal.

It's about energy gained versus energy expended.

There's a reason why people don't use coal at home. There's a reason why people DO use gasoline at home. There's a reason why phones aren't powered by capacitors. There's a reason why LEDs were used on VCRs and not lamps. There's a reason why radio controlled cars are electric and why real cars aren't.

You're assuming that people have done what they've done because they were ignorant. Or because they were greedy. Leftists always assume they know better even though never know anything about what they bitching about.

Batteries are fucking awful. Anyone who's ever used an electric drill for more than 5 minutes knows this. Batteries are unreliable, heavy, toxic, expensive, and inefficient.

There's a reason why guns are chemically powered, not electric. Rail guns are not ever going to replace firearms.

Not all sources of energy are interchangeable.

[–] 0 pt

Rail guns are not ever going to replace firearms.

Not any time soon, eventually maybe.

[–] 0 pt

You're assuming that people have done what they've done because they were ignorant. Or because they were greedy.

You're projecting. People didn't do electric cars first because they didn't have lithium battery technology, strong permanent magnet motors, and the computers necessary to manage the charge state. Now that we do, they are going to replace gasoline in a large portion of the market whether you like it or not. Economics wins over feelings every time.

Batteries are fucking awful. Anyone who's ever used an electric drill for more than 5 minutes knows this. Batteries are unreliable, heavy, toxic, expensive, and inefficient.

The only people who "know" this are people who have no idea what they're talking about. They used shitty NiCd batteries 40 years ago and figured that's how things still are. My cordless drill has enough torque that it's stronger than any person's ohe-handed grip. You can only keep it from torquing out of your hands by using both, with one at the base of the handle. My cordless electric hedge clippers cut effortlessly through 1-inch branches and it runs enough for me to only need to charge it after 3 or 4 yard days. The cordless leaf blower is better than the corded blower, and lighter. The oldest battery car in the household fleet has over 140,000 miles on it with the original battery and it's still fine. The pickup is stronger than any typical 4 or 6-cylinder sedan out there.

There's no possible way to slice batteries today as sucking. They have a lower total cost of ownership, lower maintenance, lower operating cost, and lower lifetime pollution. If you buy crap, it will work like crap. That doesn't mean everything is crap.

There's a reason why guns are chemically powered, not electric.

Mainly because magnetic projectiles are not nearly as dense as lead, nor do they offer explosive expansion like lead.

[–] 7 pts

A daily reminder that the big bad oil industry actually owns the majority of patents for "green energy." Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

[–] 2 pts

Doesn't it seem like it's always that way?

[–] 2 pts

If you have common sense and know that rich people can afford to invest into any of their future competitors with very little financial risk in doing so, then yes it was always that way. People (as in the left) really believe that suddenly when or if green energy arrives it will table flip the big oil industry and those in charge when that's not the case at all. No different than vapes to cigarettes. The ciggy companies own the patents to vaping too.

[–] 2 pts

Sure. I was just speaking to the irony of the situation. That no matter what way you turn it's alway a small group of people that control everything. I didn't mean it in a screechy leftist way.

[–] 1 pt

Only shitty dime-store vapes are directly sold by tobacco companies. Of course they get the nicotine from somewhere, which I figure is tobacco. But what I'm saying is vaping doesn't appear to be patented in a way the prevents you from doing it without permission from a patent holder. Or the Chinese are just completely ignoring the patents. I could believe that.

[–] 6 pts

The industrial process to manufacture the batteries for an electric car emit the same amount of carbon as driving an internal combustion engine 80,000 miles.

[–] 6 pts

Jew fact checkers have determined that's a portable battery pack, not a diesel generator.

[–] 2 pts

Apparently , but it is odd that they feel the need to fact check such innocuous shit.

[–] 1 pt

Of course they fact checked a meme, they are anal assholes.

[–] 5 pts

Keep "saving the world" electric car moron.

These idiots don't see the stupidity and irony of this in any way. Talk about self-absorbed.

That electric car still uses oil, so they need to get off their soapbox and quit thinking their "saving the planet" because they are NOT!

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I love watching people keep spending hundreds of dollars a month on gas while they think I'm the idiot for paying $26 a month for electricity. The cognitive dissonance cracks me up almost every day. "HEY YOU MORON! WHY ARE YOU PAYING $26 A MONTH WHEN YOU COULD BE PAYING $250? PLUS YOU COULD BE PAYING FOR OIL CHANGES, AIR FILTERS, AND OTHER SERVICE YOU AREN'T PAYING FOR NOW. YOU'RE SUCH A MORON!!! HUR DUR!"

You bought and electric car for $40k or more maybe a loan or cash.

I paid $7000 for my hybrid Toyota. I pay $50 per month. Less insurance too. I come out ahead.

[–] 0 pt

I bought a 2020 Nissan Leaf with 60 kWh battery (~250 mile range) for $23,500 out the door after rebates.

[–] 0 pt

There's no way you drive all month for $26 of electricity. That is a fucking lie, maybe $26 a week, but definitely not a month. You don't have to go around lying, it doesn't look good.

[–] 0 pt

$26 is 217 kWh of electricity ($0.12 per kWh night charging). 217 kWh will get me 975 - 1050 miles. There's no lying involved, just simple math which proves elusive for some.

[–] 4 pts

This is just another “how do we sell these people more shit?” Batteries in cars do not last longer than a well maintained gas powered engine. Planned obsolescence.

[–] 3 pts

Hey now, we can't destroy the lefts idea of where energy comes from.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Actually that's pretty smart. Energy is increased from the gas power car to the generator and then from the generator to the electric car. They are creating energy out of thin air.

[–] 1 pt

They should put the generator in the car!

[–] 2 pts

Same people who buy these expensive EVs don't realize the higher cost usually means more resource used to produce. Then they go on being green by purchasing a car every other year.

[–] 2 pts

The point of electric is that when they finally kill off 90% of people all the cars that are sitting around aren't full of fuel and oil that will go bad.

That’s not the point that’s a side effect

[–] 0 pt

They want to force everyone into self-driving cars which are easily controlled. They need to get people away from older gasoline cars and make them obsolete so they have to buy an EV that is self-driving. Now if you aren't vaxxed your EV won't be approved to move about.

[–] 2 pts

well, this IS stupid, but liberals are excited about it

Load more (7 replies)