I think all this talk of states monetizing gold is how (((they))) plan to implement CBDCs.
If you look into the details, the gold can be "transferred" electronically. In reality, you cannot transfer tangible assets electronically. Therefore, what's really going on is a narrative of gold backed currencies. As we all know here, there hasn't been a gold audit since 1953 for obvious reasons: there isn't any gold left.
China is famous for double counting tangible collateral. That is, the same collateral is used multiple times. In our case, we count gold as collateral that we don’t actually have.
Sure, now that all the gold the fed used to have is gone, they'll come after ours.
(Ps) apparently, Connecticut isn't doing the electronic transfer bit. So we'll see.
(post is archived)