Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

802

They're very obviously pushed to the top artificially, and their premises are nonsensical. They're framing the silver frenzy as counterproductive because it takes focus off GME. As if it's impossible to buy two things. It's like saying that when you go to the grocery store to buy chicken, you can't buy steak as well, because... Buy both! Physical silver though. Not SLV. SLV is a silver contract. As in, the things we're trying to take out.

They're very obviously pushed to the top artificially, and their premises are nonsensical. They're framing the silver frenzy as counterproductive because it takes focus off GME. As if it's impossible to buy two things. It's like saying that when you go to the grocery store to buy chicken, you can't buy steak as well, because... Buy both! Physical silver though. Not SLV. SLV is a silver contract. As in, the things we're trying to take out.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (29).
[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

It is within their legal rights to give you cash and no physical. I do hope you understand that.

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah, they changed the rules last time. I am fully cognizant of the reality of metals. That's why I acquired as much physical as I possibly could.

The intended outcome is to force them to convert "industrial" silver into "retail" silver, thus causing a shortfall in metal needed for real world manufacturing.

If they are forced to deliver on contract in cash (not an "option", but rather a "force majeur" option of last resort) they will decouple the paper silver "SLV" from the physical metals themselves.

Paper silver can be whatever they want it to be. But change the zeitgeist, and physical silver will shoot to where it should be, $3000+.

https://usdebtclock.org