WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

586
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/march-study-points-to-pervasive-mental-illness-among-white-american-liberals/ https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/over-50-percent-white-liberal-women-under-30-mental-health-condition https://pic8.co/sh/6Setvy.gif

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

I seriously doubt this, not to mention black women are the least desirable mate in almost every metric.

I think I can prove this handily with genetic studies. White americans have very little black DNA, like maybe 2% on average.

AAs have around 20-25% of their autosomal DNA from white ancestry. Studies of their mtDNA (maternal) show very low frequency of white haplotypes ( ~3% or so) but when you look at AA male Y-chromosomes, a full third of them are white haplogroups like R1b. There are very few R1b y-chromosomes in west african groups like the ghanians or yorubans. Therefore the most plausible explanation is that 1/3 or african males (and females) are the direct male decendent of a mating between a white male with R1b y-chromosome and a black female with african mtDNA. Which would account for about 90% of the white autosomal DNA in blacks.

Regardless of desireability, black women are an option for low status white males who are driven to meet their biological imperative.

Another example of white male micegenation is the latino race who have about 50% white autosomal DNA but like 90 or 95% white Y chromosomes from iberians.

White people as a race are hybrids of aryan males who conquered and mated with earlier europeans such as the anatolian derived neolithic agriculturalists.

Youve got a broad brush for white females who “worship nigger dick” but suddenly you are real particular in pointing out that you are “not american” so what white males do in one place doesn’t apply to you. Convenient.

Why would you assume I have a dedicated meme folder for the von trapp family? It's lazy posting.

You are judging crunchy on his lack of cultural posts. These cultural posts are 80% of the milkmaid variety.

Maybe we take back anthropology before the do-gooders and the neo-liberals smelt the rest of our heritage and our identity along with it?

Im good with this. We need to start our own institute somewhere. But we need to lose this constant “all white women are faithless dirty whores, everything is their fault” shit. Some level of objectivity is required and the endless blaming has got to go.

[–] 0 pt

AAs have around 20-25% of their autosomal DNA from white ancestry.

Again, like it matters how much Caucasian DNA American nogs have. Is this true for blacks the planet over? No, it is not.

You are clearly asserting that whenever there is race mixing, it is always with a white male master and his black slave.

Miscegenation by gender. (pewresearch.org) Statistically according to a 2014 polling that Black men are fucking anything other than black women.

Youve got a broad brush for white females who “worship nigger dick” but suddenly you are real particular in pointing out that you are “not american” so what white males do in one place doesn’t apply to you. Convenient.

Hit a nerve there huh? All men are to blame for miscegenation; don't blame any women! This is the contradiction I've been trying to highlight from your first throw-away post. Also why should I be responsible for what you perceive men are doing on another continent?

If I see a trend forming for X group and I believe it's detrimental to the success of my race, I am inclined to point it out. Maybe its X generation, maybe its X fraternity, or X gender. Men are disproportionately more likely to be consumers of drugs which is highly disgenic. It's more prevalent because of cultural acceptance as displayed in cinematography and media where young men partake in drug use which has normalised the behavior in real life. Why do you believe some women that partake race-mixing behaviour are beyond reproach? It is as if you are personally scorned on behalf of your gender for the actions of others or that you too have previously been in their shoes?

You are judging crunchy on his lack of cultural posts.

I have done no such thing, that is a sweeping, sensationalist assumption. Don't presume to draw inference what my opinions are on crunchy's posts, we were getting along just fine. Typical female behaviour trying to deflect culpability by starting drama elsewhere.

These cultural posts are 80% of the milkmaid variety.

...and I've stated it shouldn't be, I've already stipulated what I would like to see, you are being irrational and disingenuous. What about Lapland solar festivals, Dutch Zwarte Piet celebration, Espana corrida de Toros, artefacts from antiquity in Britain?

No, apparently culturally significant posts can only be young blonde girls in gingham and you're tired of seeing them.

Some level of objectivity is required and the endless blaming has got to go.

This can be achieved when we have ascertained culpability. Sometimes when you do something wrong you have to take responsibility for your actions, it indicates maturity, growth and development. You are not personally to blame for the actions of others, but we can't keep sweeping inconvenient and unpalatable truths under the rug because you get offended by it.

How is anything going to get fixed if you personally get hyper offended by general constructive and indirect criticism?