>The ruling suggests that in Kansas a man can only legally be considered a sperm donor if he goes through a doctor. >Shawnee County District Court Judge Mary Mattivi said: "A parent may not terminate parental rights by contract even when the parties have consented. >"The parties' self-designation of (Mr Marotta) as a sperm donor is insufficient to relieve (Mr Marotta) of parental rights and responsibilities." He done fucked up. It has to be documented through the medical and legal channels in order to receive protections from paternity lawsuits. Simply declaring one's self to be a sperm donor, even with consent of all parties involved in the child's conception and birth, does not meet the legal requirements for immunity. I don't normally side with corrupt family courts on these issues, but in this case I believe they have legal standing to make such a ruling. Never donate sperm, even through the established channels.