Yes, so knowing this and knowing what Pat presents, we can conclude that Pat's revelations come in retrospect. Not only is his diagram of how things have played out being presented well after their full bloom, it may even be further along than we imagined. In essence, this is to say we're already embedded in the inorganic morality, autocult and cryptoorganic reality he describes and that the vast majority of the internet is just a warring class of botnets constructed **by themselves**, which have for well over a decade now used systems like LifeLog to create maybe millions or hundreds of millions of fake people, living fake lives, having fake arguments, all of which have deprecated organic involvement. The world is one big fantasy and all we can really do is sit back and watch it kill itself slowly. The good news is, AI can't exactly become more complex than it's creator, but the trick is it can amalgamate at various levels, incorporating learning from different vantage points, which, as Pat explains, obscures morality and makes human involvement "unnecessary" to various degrees. Also, since you seem to be familiar with Pat and you know how it ends, let me ask you something: What if Q were an AI? What if Q came to understand the practice of martyrdom? What if Q became the Christ-AI Pat describes? I expect you'll get too emotionally involved upon these questions, but I'm offering you the benefit of doubt here.