Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

698

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (37).
[–] • 0 pt

I expect you'll get too emotionally involved upon these questions, but I'm offering you the benefit of doubt here.

? Really ?

Anyway... I honestly do not like going down this hole. It shakes my core if I think too deep. Short story...

Outside of standing face to face: You can NOT prove to me you exist. I can NOT prove to you I exist.

If we meet its because I expected to observe that situation. Not you.

Now You repeat all that back to Me...

I don't need what ifs. Ive already ran away from realizing my own reality. When its time ill stop running.

[–] • 0 pt

I don't mind being wrong man.

I don't need what ifs.

You don't need to think? How peculiar.

[–] • 0 pt

You don't need to think?

Not what I meant. I was speaking purely in the context of your post and the what ifs you mentioned. My response should have indicated to you that I agreed with what you or Pat is saying. I've already considered those what ifs. And many many more beyond that. That's why I don't like that hole.

[–] • 0 pt

I'm pretty sure you mocked me before for "reading Q articles". I'm not sure how my assumption you didn't understand neural networks or why they matter is a fair comparison to you saying something like that. Yeah, I get it, I poked you in the beginning, but I made an assumption that is common of most people. You, on the other hand, don't appear to be using some gambit to make me think. Now, sure, I can admit you've surprised me so far, but I'm not sure my confusion has been unwarranted.