Uh, the problem with this hypothetical is that leftists have always been intertwined with eugenics as a means to exercise their totalitarian agenda.
See: Margaret Sanger, used eugenic reasoning to found PP 'cause she hated the niggers breeding. #based
See: phrenology. E: even though the fugging Jews did it
See: transhumanists (associated with the trans movement as well) arguing for eugenics and selective breeding to be implemented as a means to achieve their insanity.
The conception of eugenics as a vector to cement the tyranny of public health and the liberal hegemony lobbying for it to cull and "civilize" the "unwashed masses" has been gestating for centuries.
I'm aware that some leftists in the past were eugenicists. I'm also aware of some leftists being into transhumanism. However, current leftists bash on eugenics as a Nazi thing and transhumanism is a fringe movement.
My point is that the left is currently not hereditarian and convincing them to be so would not result in eugenics as I envision it due to the left being the cultural hegemon that it is. Rather than seeing hereditarianism necessitating certain beliefs be moderated or abandoned they'd just assimilate it to use in their unchanged core beliefs.
and the "american leftist" "core belief" is something more than gibs?!.
Oh, hello there.
(post is archived)