WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

394

Reading a paper on "screening syndromes" updating the vernacular of genocide. They're genociding babies with genetic abnormalities and just want to cover their arses with legal terminology. Other conventions says you can't use gene editing to affect the genome of descendants. OTOH, essentially disabilities do not constitute genocide.

The elimination of a whole classification of people (those with a genetic disability) allows a slippery slope.

The world certainly has changed.

Reading a paper on "screening syndromes" updating the vernacular of genocide. They're genociding babies with genetic abnormalities and just want to cover their arses with legal terminology. Other conventions says you can't use gene editing to affect the genome of descendants. OTOH, essentially disabilities do not constitute genocide. The elimination of a whole classification of people (those with a genetic disability) allows a slippery slope. The world certainly has changed.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts (edited )

As does gene editing out a population of people. So (((they))) are redefining "genocide" to allow for well- genocide.

[–] 1 pt

Have you ever heard the term "epi-eugenics"?

I've heard of epigenetics, basically what the covid vax probably does. I'll look into epi-eugenics, sounds interesting.

[–] 1 pt

Instead of performing eugenics on others, the simplest way I can explain it is by convincing others to perform eugenics on themselves. Like ssri's, abortion clinics, encouraging niggerfaggot behavior, race mixing....and so on

Too right. what a great term "epi-eugenics". Deserves dictionary status.