Unsurprisingly eugenics gets support by another genetically deficient, eh, offer and demand
That being said I don't necessarily disagree with him. When it comes to eugenics, if used to fix crippling conditions, strictly used in a medical context when it's actually necessary, I'm all for it
Now if it's to turn into a free for all, to engineer the fantasies of any random clod given the latest fad, from blue apples to double glowing dicks, it's no. It's just no.
Because the risks far outweight the real or supposed benefits. And that's something most clods can't even begin grasp conceptually speaking.
Unsurprisingly eugenics gets support by another genetically deficient, eh, offer and demand
That being said I don't necessarily disagree with him. When it comes to eugenics, if used to fix crippling conditions, strictly used in a medical context when it's actually necessary, I'm all for it
Now if it's to turn into a free for all, to engineer the fantasies of any random clod given the latest fad, from blue apples to double glowing dicks, it's no. It's just no.
Because the risks far outweight the real or supposed benefits. And that's something most clods can't even begin grasp conceptually speaking.
Maybe it should be framed as combatting dysgenics rather than promoting eugenics.
Maybe it should be framed as combatting dysgenics rather than promoting eugenics.
(post is archived)