WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

779

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts

No golden parachutes.

[–] 5 pts

Go back to streetshitting, Fagrawal.

[–] 2 pts

More info? I'm not going to believe him just because a blue check said so.

[–] 6 pts

Musk found evidence of Parag Agrawal and Twitter's board conspiring to fabricate user counts and cover it up.

Firing Parag because Elon thinks he's a douche canoe = Parag gets his golden parachute.

Firing Parag because he falsified financial records and materially misrepresented the company's value to shareholders is firing for cause (somewhere between gross misconduct and SEC Fraud). Firing for cause decreases the golden parachute clause to $0, the same as you're not getting severance if you get fired for stealing money from the till.

[–] 1 pt

Would all the twitter shareholders have a case against Agrawal personally for fraud or somesuch?

[–] 3 pts

Nominally? Yes. In Clown World? Parag could molest kids on live tv and the courts would do nothing.

[–] 1 pt

So what about the other faggots, like the queen of thought crimes and such?

[–] 0 pt

I'd think he wasn't conspiring with himself?

[–] 0 pt

Perfect. Exactly what I needed to know. Thanks man.

[–] 2 pts

Check this sub. Someone posted an article about it earlier.