WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

317

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Just remember that Elon is not some humble means successful entrepreneur. He was literally born with a silver spoon in his mouth and is clearly in the club.

He's not replacing NASA, privatization is replacing NASA. I'm sure he's pegged to make lots of money doing his part to replace what our tax dollars used to do for us.

[–] 0 pt

He has already begun replacing the image of Nasa. No longer are people questioning the validity of Nasa because they trust this new up and coming "hip billionaire" and his STARLINK program, in which they work side by side with NASA anyway.

[–] 0 pt

NASA hasn't done in the last 45 years what Space X has done in 5. Of course, people would be focusing on Space X. I'm not against privatization. I just think it's kinda stupid and retarded to pretend it's the only solution to corrupt and inefficient public programs. And I understand that NASA has been laughably underfunded for a very long time, it's just sad to see the American taxpayers thinking its more important to bomb children in poor countries instead of developing interstellar travel.

[–] 0 pt

NASA has been collaborating with SpaceX since 2005. They are all under the control of international kikes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX#2010%E2%80%932012:_Falcon_9,_Dragon,_and_NASA_contracts

SpaceX originally intended to follow its light Falcon 1 launch vehicle with an intermediate capacity vehicle, the Falcon 5. The company instead decided in 2005 to proceed with the development of the Falcon 9, a reusable heavier lift vehicle. Development of the Falcon 9 was accelerated by NASA, which committed to purchase several commercial flights if specific capabilities were demonstrated.