Wrong, according to anthropologists, all of the people I listed are considered part of the Caucasoid race, an antiquated label, which is "white."
This is why you should leave the thinking to the educated and intelligent people.
How long did it take you to look up all the terms I listed for you? hehehe
Happy to discuss this further if you like.
Not at all. You are no where intelligent or educated enough to be able to hold a conversation with me about white people when you're supposedly a white nationalist.
Seriously, you're too stupid for my tastes.
You should quote smart people like me more often, though. You might learn something.
This is fucking hillarious. This site needs like a sticky or some master threads for absolute gems like this one.
Wow.
I agree. To stand as a shining example of how retarded people like you are. I don't think you realized you fell right into a trap. You had 2 choices: double down, then be made to look like a fool when I pointed out that all those people are "white"
or just admit you were wrong and clearly a moron who knows nothing.
Like I said, you didn't even try to do the second one.
Here are the 3 antiquated race categories:
Caucasoid ("white") Mongoloid (Asian) Negroid (black)
Europeans are exclusively Caucasoid.
But a white supremacist would never ever say that a Turk is the same race as a Nord and that both are white people.
But you tried to. You tried to say the Western Civilization is exclusively white. It's not. It's got a shitload of people in it. If you still hold onto the antiquated ideas of race, then you have no choice but to admit that the European people's are comprised of multiple races. Some of which would not be considered white by your specific definitions and standards.
In reality, I bet you I'm whiter than you are. By blood and skin color. In a room full of white people, I'm usually the whitest. Does this make you seethe?
(post is archived)