Won't be the first time it's happened to human civilization.
Start off in wild, untamed circumstances.
Strong, smart people who can build, fight, and lead, end up in control because weak and stupid people are worthless.
Women and faggots have no power because they're not capable of mastering a threatening, uncivilized environment.
Strong, smart people master and civilize a threatening environment, bringing about peace and safety, enabling weak people to thrive because the rules of civilization say that you can't brutalize them to keep them in their natural position in the pecking order, which was previously a job done by the circumstances of life itself.
Weak people (faggots and women) use their newfound safety within the network of nature-preventing rules to get away with behavior that would have had them starving, beaten, ostracized, and even killed, had they pulled the same shit in an environment where there were direct consequences for undermining the strong, smart people who were keeping them alive.
Everyone is too civilized and far removed from the knowledge of cause & effect to understand why these people should be forcefully kept out of power, and they all continue to Follow The Rules while weak people are seizing every opportunity to abuse The Rules (can't hit me, haha! can't discriminate, haha! give me power! let me in your school! let men in dresses read to your toddler! haha! we're in charge now!) in order to take control of a society they could never have built on their own.
Society then collapses because it became too civilized to do what was necessary to keep itself alive in the face of power-seeking weak people who sought to undermine its values in order to gain influence and control they are not capable of attaining in nature.
Everything becomes an absolute nightmare for decades, if not a century or more, as generation after generation reacclimate to what it's like to have no food, no utilities, no safety, and no happiness, and then eventually the weak become powerless again as strength becomes required for survival. Women go back to being women because they can't survive without playing a support role for strong men, faggots go back to hiding and staying quiet because strong men won't put up with their shit and aren't afraid to fuck them up, because they know weak men will undermine them.
And then the cycle repeats.
Ah well, I'm a woman so...
Ah well, I'm a woman so...
Doesn't change anything. Weakness isn't an insult, it's just a statement of factual circumstance.
Compared to men, you are a physically weaker being, and in a scenario where the environment, the animals, and other people are a constant threat, your only means of survival is in a support role to a group willing to protect you, i.e., your tribe, your husband, your village, etc.
If you try the "I don't need no man" approach as a lone female in an uncivilized world, you will end up being captured, raped, enslaved, or killed. Women are in general not capable of independent survival in nature, as their physiology makes them prey that are hunted as a resource, either by animals to be used as food, or by other people to be used as labor or for breeding.
Being physically weak also predisposes a person toward certain behavior. You cannot use force to achieve your goals, you cannot bet your safety, security, or claim to power on other people being too afraid to mess with you. Your only means to achieve power and influence is through the manipulation of established rules and social connections. Nobody is afraid of you beating them up, they're afraid of the men you're going to call if you're upset. If you are weak, have no social connections, and there is no social system protecting you, then you are at the mercy of more powerful people.
Thus, women and faggots both instinctively manipulate and undermine society for their own self-interest.
This is the reason that throughout human history it's been known that weak men and women are not to be given power or authority over anything, or to be taken seriously in matters of politics or war. They will almost always follow a predictable behavioral path that leads to them making decisions based on the mindset of a weak or fearful individual who either wants to be overly social and avoid conflict (inviting in incompatible foreigners and refugees who disrupt the host society) or to abuse their positions and angle for self-interest at the expense of stronger people they view as threats (disempowering masculine men and promoting weakness)
Being female yourself doesn't invalidate the reality of a single one of these observations.
(post is archived)